My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 01/30/08 Work Session
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2008
>
CC Minutes - 01/30/08 Work Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 10:28:12 AM
Creation date
7/18/2008 2:52:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Work Session
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/30/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
not contiguous, would be unable to build on that property. He wanted to assure there was clear agreement <br />between the County and the City about who was responsible for providing services inside the UGB. <br /> <br />Mr. Pryor suggested that the issue could be addressed through a friendly amendment. <br /> <br />Mr. Clark withdrew his motion and offered a friendly amendment to add ORS 190 agree- <br />ments, to include a discussion of permitting and service delivery in unincorporated areas, as <br />a discussion item under the Metro Plan topic. Mr. Pryor and Ms. Bettman accepted the <br />friendly amendment. <br /> <br />Mr. Pryor also suggested that transportation planning, TransPlan and transportation funding could be <br />merged into one topic. He said that would result in a priorities list of the following topics: <br /> <br />? <br /> <br />Transportation (planning, funding, TransPlan) <br />? <br /> <br />Metro Plan/UGB (including ORS 190 agreements, permitting and service delivery) <br />? <br /> <br />Homeless issues <br />? <br /> <br />Public safety <br />? <br /> <br />Race issues <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman said it appeared that Springfield believed the UGB could be split before any other steps. She <br />pro tem <br />asked if that issue would fall under the topic of Metro Plan/UGB. City Manager Jones said it <br />would. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman, seconded by Ms. Taylor, moved to add a discussion of creating an Area <br />Commission on Transportation to the priorities list. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman said that this was the only region in the State that did not have an ACT. She said the planning <br />standards and criteria for an ACT would bring the entire region together to look at funding and planning and <br />the products that resulted from the process, which included stakeholders from many different venues, had a <br />certain amount of credibility. She said the creation of the Citizen Advisory Committee was an end run <br />around creating an ACT and the result was that there was still no citizen or stakeholder involvement. <br /> <br />The vote on the motion was a 4:4 tie; Ms. Taylor, Ms. Bettman, Ms. Ortiz, and Mr. Ze- <br />lenka voting in favor and Ms. Solomon, Mr. Poling, Mr. Pryor, and Mr. Clark voting in <br />opposition. The mayor cast a vote in favor of the motion and it passed on a final vote of <br />5:4. <br /> <br />The main motion as amended passed, 6:2; Ms. Bettman and Ms. Taylor voting in opposi- <br />tion. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy suggested that potential outcomes for the JEO meeting could be identifying the top priorities <br />that the three jurisdictions wanted to consider and the order in which they should be addressed, work plans <br />for each jurisdiction and the next steps to be taken. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman said that prioritizing the list should involve breaking it down into specifics before the JEO <br />meeting. She said an issue for her was that Springfield intended to undertake certain tasks and provide <br />Eugene with the findings, but she did not think constituents elected the council to delegate that authority to <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council January 30, 2008 Page 6 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.