My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 2A: Approval of City Council Minutes
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2008
>
CC Agenda - 07/28/08 Meeting
>
Item 2A: Approval of City Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:27:29 PM
Creation date
7/25/2008 9:36:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
7/28/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ATTACHMENT C <br /> <br />M I N U T E S <br /> <br /> <br />Eugene City Council <br />Regular Meeting <br />Council Chamber—Eugene City Hall <br /> <br /> May 27, 2008 <br /> 7:30 p.m. <br /> <br /> <br />COUNCILORS PRESENT: Chris Pryor, Bonny Bettman, Mike Clark, Andrea Ortiz, Betty Taylor, <br />Jennifer Solomon, Alan Zelenka, George Poling. <br /> <br /> <br />Her Honor Mayor Kitty Piercy called the regular meeting of the Eugene City Council to order. <br /> <br />1. PUBLIC FORUM <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy reviewed the rules of the Public Forum. <br /> <br />Bill Kievith <br />, 3277 Onyx Place, wished to speak about potholes. He pointed out that the City of Eugene was <br />built on clay soil that expanded and contracted with the weather. He averred that it took a better than <br />average road to last for a long time. He felt the City did not invest the amount of money in roads that was <br />needed. He asserted that the City had its General Fund but did not prioritize fixing roads. He found this <br />difficult to accept. He recalled that the director of Public Works had indicated that the “level of service” for <br />a pothole was three inches. He also had heard that 75 percent of potholes were located on unimproved <br />streets. He did not want to spend large amounts of money to fix potholes on unimproved roads which he <br />thought might need fixing on a monthly basis. He encouraged the council to get citizens involved and to <br />educate them about the pothole problem and what it needed for resolution prior to placing something on the <br />ballot. <br /> <br />th <br />Sarah Dailey <br />, 650 West 12 Avenue, #209, wished to address Eugene Code 5.450 regarding skateboarding. <br />She declared that she was a working person who regularly made the environmentally friendly and conscien- <br />tious decision to skateboard to and from work. She also enjoyed skateboarding as a recreational pastime. <br />She recently had become aware of the confusing nature of the skateboarding code due to the way it was <br />being enforced. She related that recently her partner had been pulled over and ticketed for skateboarding on <br />the sidewalk on Olive Street and Broadway. She said three weeks earlier she and her partner had been <br />riding their skateboards in the street and had been stopped by a Eugene policeman, who explained that <br />skateboarding was to be done on the sidewalk and was not allowed in the street. She explained the recent <br />ticket for riding the skateboard on the sidewalk but the officer had insisted that skateboarding should only <br />occur on the sidewalk. She related that she moved onto the sidewalk and saw a stencil on the concrete that <br />indicated that skateboarding there was forbidden. She said it became clear that skateboarding laws were <br />being interpreted and enforced unevenly and that there remained confusion even among police officers <br />whether or not skateboarding was allowed on the street or the sidewalk. She referred to Section 2(d) of the <br />code. She found it confusing as it indicated that no person should skateboard in the portion of the street <br />designated for automobile traffic. She thought it could be interpreted to mean that a skateboard should not <br />be ridden in the street at all or that it should be restricted to the portion of the street designated for bicycles. <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council May 27, 2008 Page 1 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.