Laserfiche WebLink
the City Manager to “bring a proposal to a future council work session for a GO Bond measure to fund <br />$81 million of pavement capital preservation projects over 10 years within an appropriate timeframe to <br />place the question on the May 2008 ballot. The proposal should include ballot measure language that <br />provides for both a list of high priority pavement capital preservation projects and appropriate flexibility <br />for planning activities and changing pavement capital preservation project priorities.” <br /> <br />On January 28, council continued discussions of an approach to use General Obligation bonds for street <br />preservation projects. Council directed the City Manager to “bring a resolution forward placing an $81 <br />million General Obligation bond measure to be used for preservation only, no system capacity <br />enhancements, on the November 2008 ballot.” A friendly amendment was added to provide a complete <br />project list as part of the ballot measure. The $81 million bond measure will provide for $6.5 million of <br />overlays and reconstruction activities each year, factoring in the cost of inflation over a 10-year period. <br /> <br />On June 9, council continued discussions about using General Obligation bonds for street preservation <br />projects. At that meeting, council directed the City Manager to bring back a resolution placing an $81.1 <br />million GO bond measure on the November 2008 ballot, consistent with the initial project list and the <br />draft resolution provided at that meeting. There remained, however, significant questions about how to <br />provide assurance to voters as to which specific street repair projects would be accomplished as a result <br />of approval of the bonds, what the appropriate timing of the bond measure should be, and how citizens <br />will be informed about the need for the bond measure. <br /> <br />On June 23, council discussed street assessment policies. At that meeting, several councilors requested <br />information about including an element in this bond measure to fund the City’s share of assessment <br />project costs. <br /> <br />On July 16, council continued discussions about the GO bond measure. At that meeting, council <br />directed the City Manager to bring back two bond resolutions, one for $35.9 million of projects over 5 <br />years and one for $81.1 million of projects over 10 years. The measure for five years should not include <br />any provision to remove projects from the list, but should allow bond funds to be used for additional <br />projects, upon a council vote, for the next highest street preservation projects on the city’s list once all <br />the other projects are complete. The ten year measure should allow for changes in the project list, upon <br />th <br />an affirmative vote by at least 6 councilors, in the 10 year of the measure. <br /> <br />Z:\CMO\2008 Council Agendas\M080728\S0807283andattA.doc <br />