Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Bettman said if one had the intent to get the motion out there but found it not possible to do so, <br />parliamentary rules should not be imposed upon the body. She thought such a situation was only a remote <br />instance and if it happened it was up to the council to decide whether or not to proceed with the motion <br />depending on the circumstances. She felt there had only been a few instances under which a councilor <br />had been specifically undermined, but given that former Mayor Torrey was no longer in office she <br />asserted this was not likely to happen anymore. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor commented that things of this nature had occurred in the past. <br /> <br />Mr. Pap6 acceded that clarifying rules were not necessary at this time. <br /> <br />Ms. Hayes noted that the last item to be discussed under the operating agreements was parking. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman discussed her difficulties in finding parking for meetings and the number of parking tickets <br />she received given that meetings were sometimes unpredictably long. <br /> <br />Mr. Poling suggested a universal parking permit. He registered his offense at the last sentence in the <br />memorandum on parking that indicated the annual cost was $6,000. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly thought the 4A parking permit could serve as the universal permit. <br /> <br />City Manager Taylor asked if it would be possible to create a special parking key for the councilors or, <br />perhaps, coupons. Mr. Kelly thought a parking key that would work in the meters could end up costing <br />more. City Manager Taylor also suggested a parking decal that would allow councilors to park in all City- <br />owned and managed parking spaces. He indicated he would investigate the possibilities. <br /> <br />Ms. Utecht asked the councilors if they wished to work on the Shared Expectations List. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor and Mr. Kelly indicated their preference not to work on it. Mr. Poling thought Mr. Pryor and <br />Ms. Ortiz could ask the senior members of the council clarifying questions if they wanted to. <br /> <br />Ms. Ortiz asked if the list had been distilled from a larger list. She requested a copy of the larger list. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy commented that the expectations might not be shared given that they were not actually <br />adopted. <br /> <br />Ms. Utecht commented that there was a lengthy discussion on the expectations in September 2003. She <br />asked that Ms. Rose provide the three new members with copies of the full discussion. Should they feel a <br />need to further discuss the list, she suggested they bring the list to the next process session. <br /> <br />Ms. Hayes called for a ten-minute break. <br /> <br /> 3) Boards and Commissions Process <br /> <br />Ms. Walston explained that the Boards and Commissions process existed on two levels, the "macro level," <br />as dictated by code, and the "micro level," consisting of the council's process to set up interviews and <br />timelines. She noted that some interview questions were redundant and there had been some confusion as <br />to who should be interviewed and with other aspects of the interviews. She said there had not been a <br />comprehensive look at the Boards and Commissions process and the codes that govern them in twelve <br />years. <br /> <br />MINUTES-- Eugene City Council February 8, 2005 Page 7 <br /> Process Session <br /> <br /> <br />