Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Pryor liked the distinction between the work sessions and the process sessions. He found the process <br />session to be the most helpful and useful meeting he had participated in thus far. He did not mind waiting <br />until April to finish addressing the issue. <br /> <br />Ms. Utecht asked the mayor and councilors how they wished to proceed. <br /> <br />After some discussion on whether to schedule an additional earlier process session, the council decided to <br />have staff work on the results from the discussion and bring the extrapolation back to the council process <br />session scheduled for Monday, April 18. <br /> <br />Mr. Pap6 objected to allowing this topic to take up the whole process session. <br /> <br />Ms. Ortiz said it was an important topic. She wanted to do it right so that the results would have a long <br />shelf life and did not want to limit the process. <br /> <br />Mr. Pap6 suggested splitting the issue and addressing one piece in the process session and one piece in a <br />work session. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor advocated for devoting the process session to this issue. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly stated that there was formalized code language for standardized commissions and committees, <br />but there was nothing like that for committees formed by the mayor. He thought there should be some <br />kind of guiding language for mayor's committeesl He opined there was some value in bounding what a <br />mayor's committee could be. He noted that the council had approved the nominations for former Mayor <br />Torrey's Economic Development Committee. He likened it to the Senate approving the President's <br />nominations and advocated for continuing this supervisory role. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy said while she recognized why the issue had arisen, she only had a couple of things under <br />her charge, the ability to weigh in on the agenda and the right to form committees (with the caveat that <br />budget considerations had to be weighed), and the rest of her job was "showing up." She was concerned <br />about being constrained, especially given that any recommendations or proposed actions that resulted <br />from a committee would come before the council anyway. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor concurred with Mr. Kelly. She remarked that the council was "expected" to support the <br />results from such committees. She felt a committee should bring ideas but not have the assumption that <br />the council would automatically support them. <br /> <br />Mr. Pap6 said he would not put limitations on the mayor's committees. <br /> <br />Mr. Pryor called it a great check and balance. He thought it was an interesting conversation but did not <br />want to constrain the rights of the executive branch. <br /> <br />Ms. Utecht observed that Mr. Kelly and Ms. Taylor were the only councilors interested in discussing this <br />item further. Mr. Kelly suggested the item be "parked" until fall 2005. <br /> <br /> 4) Strategic Planning Session <br /> <br />City Manager Taylor asked if the suggested start and stop times would work for councilors. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly could not make it on Friday until 10 a.m. <br /> <br />MINUTES-- Eugene City Council February 8, 2005 Page 10 <br /> Process Session <br /> <br /> <br />