My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 7 - Ord/Pub.Contract.Code
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2005
>
CC Agenda - 02/28/05 Mtg
>
Item 7 - Ord/Pub.Contract.Code
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:54:47 PM
Creation date
2/23/2005 3:28:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
2/28/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Statutory Requirements. Based on the foregoing: <br /> <br /> 1. It is unlikely that the exemption will encourage favoritism in the awarding <br />of public improvements contracts or substantially diminish competition for public <br />improvement contract; and <br /> <br /> 2. The awarding of public improvement contracts under the exemption will <br />result in substantial cost savings to the city because evaluation of factors in addition to <br />price are essential to the success of projects under this classification. <br /> <br />(b) Ener,qy savin,qs performance contracts. Unless the contract qualifies for award <br />under another classification in this section 2.1430, contractors for energy savings <br />performance contracts shall be selected under a request for proposals. <br /> <br />Alternate AwardProcess. Requires the use of formal, advertised request for <br />proposals. <br /> <br />Cost Savings and Other Benefits. Energy savings performance contracts will include <br />scientific analysis, engineering and design services, cost-benefit analysis, construction <br />services and subsequent scientific testing and monitoring services. ESP projects may <br />be phased in over several years. Award of ESPCs to the lowest bidder under an <br />invitation to bid would impair the city's ability to evaluate the skill, experience and <br />educational qualifications of the contractor's team and dramatically increase the risk of <br />unsuccessful projects, waste and improper expenditure of public funds. <br /> <br />Affect on Competition. Requires complete and open competition to the same pool of <br />potential contractors that would be qualified to respond to an invitation to bid. <br /> <br />No Favoritism. Requires complete and open competition to the same pool of potential <br />contractors that would be qualified to respond to an invitation to bid. <br /> <br />Other Factors. The model rules adopted by the Attorney General for this class of <br />contracts require evaluation under a request for proposals due to the heavy scientific <br />analysis and design requirements for this class of contracts. <br /> <br />Statutory Requirements. Based on the foregoing: <br /> <br /> 1. It is unlikely that the exemption will encourage favoritism in the awarding <br />of public improvements contracts or substantially diminish competition for public <br />improvement contract; and <br /> <br /> 2. The awarding of public improvement contracts under the exemption will <br />result in substantial cost savings to the city because evaluation of factors in addition to <br />price are essential to the success of projects under this classification. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.