My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-26-16 Work Session
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Public Meetings
>
CMO
>
2016
>
09-26-2016
>
09-26-16 Work Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/23/2016 9:54:10 AM
Creation date
9/23/2016 9:53:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Packet
CMO_Meeting_Date
9/26/2016
CMO_Effective_Date
9/26/2016
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
203
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
continued stalemate and a loss of public trust. Through Collaborative Community <br />Goal Setting, we hop to ensure neighborhood livability and economic vibrancy while <br />also accomplishing broader city-wide goals, thus maintaining the integrity of Envision <br />Eugene’s seven pillars. <br />WHAT WOULD THE OUTCOMES BE? <br />The outcome of the Collaborative Community Goal Setting process would be a <br />specific recommendation to City Council, for City Council to vote on, from the <br />community Team that answers the following questions: <br />1.For each of the six key transit corridors and downtown, how much new <br />development of each type (multi-family, single family, missing middle, etc.) is <br />each area's "share" to accomplish broader community goals and appropriately <br />manage growth? <br />2.How many sites for homeless and very-low-income housing are needed in each <br />region to ensure that these needed facilities are distributed fairly and not <br />concentrated in one area? <br />3.What areas along the corridors should be the initial focus for localized planning <br />efforts, with the understanding that the exact boundaries may change as the <br />local teams delve into the details and additional community outreach will need <br />to occur if that happens....For example, River Road is a long corridor-- is there <br />a specific part of River Road that it makes sense to focus on first? <br />4.What infrastructure and service investments are the highest priority for each <br />area, given their relative strengths and needs, to provide information for the <br />local team to expand upon further? This would include things such as parks, <br />commercial centers, transportation infrastructure, etc. For example, a true 20- <br />minute neighborhood needs parks/open space, commercial areas, transit, etc. <br />nearby. Perhaps, during the course of this process, it is determined that the <br />West 11th corridor has comparatively good transportation resources, but lacks <br />parkland, while South Willamette has a comparatively good supply of <br />parks/open space, but faces more transportation challenges. This analysis <br />would help focus and put into context the refinement-plan level discussions. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.