09-26-16 Work Session - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ATTACHMENTC MINUTES EugeneCityCouncil Avenue HarrisHall,125East8 th Eugene,Oregon97401 September19,2016 6:00p.m. CouncilorsPresent: CouncilorsAbsent: Public Forum on South Willamette Planning: 1. 1. David Monk – SW-SAZ created unnecessary consequences; meaningful public participation is needed. 2. Ed Moye – We need infill that won’t destroy neighborhoods; eager to proceed with Clark/Brown proposal. 3. Vic Hariton – Current process is causing distrust; refinement plan is needed; support Clark/Brown proposal. 4. Sue Wolling – Planning needs to be in the framework of Envision Eugene; need an intermediate step. 5. Josh Newman – Talk to impacted people first; need process to bridge Envision Eugene and refinement plan. 6. Eliza Kashinsky – Support incremental growth in neighborhoods and Envision Eugene; need a community process to clarify language and process. 7. Emily Semple – Eager to form a team for a refinement plan and community planning team on this. 8. Gerry Meenaghan – Collaborate with neighborhoods on a refinement plan; walkability needs to apply across the city. 9. Ron Bevirt – Need to focus on residents of affected area and get input from them; need refinement plan. 10. Janet Bevirt – Refinement plan needs to be the foundation of future planning efforts. 11. Bill Aspegren – New approach needed; need a refinement plan like Clark/Brown proposal. 12. Mary Brorby – Process was forced upon residents; more response from City on issues are needed. 13. Brian Weaver – City is opposed to community-based process; stakeholders are last to have input. 14. Jennifer Smith – Rent in Eugene is too high; workforce housing is needed; citywide plan and goals are needed. 15. Howie Bonnett – Willamette Street needs a lot of help. 16. Eben Fodor – Lots of fundamental problems with SW-SAZ; building heights a big concern; support walkability. 17. Christine Sundt – CCRs for four affected subdivisions are valid and could become a litigation issue. 18. Richard Sundt – Support densification by multi-use buildings and Clark/Brown proposal. 19. Joyce Eaton – Support refinement plan; engagement process was lacking in SW-SAZ process. 20. Bonny McCornack – Reject premise that density is needed; sprawl will continue unless other action is taken. 21. Ralph McDonald – Trees were at risk with SW-SAZ; affects climate change efforts. 22. Pam Wooddell – Affordability and sustainability issues need to be addressed. 23. Lena Houston-Davisson – Move forward with refinement process and community engagement. 24. Peter Gallagher – Clear answers to questions by Planning Department are needed. 25. Seth Sadofsky – City missed a step with SW-SAZ; take a step back and have a community process. 26. Joshua Skov – Engage residents; be clear about values; manage growth explicitly. 27. Ron Funke – Drive times are too long; infrastructure needs to be relocated underground. MINUTES – Eugene City Council September 19, 2016 Page 1 Public Forum