My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-26-16 Work Session
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Public Meetings
>
City Council
>
2016
>
09-26-2016
>
09-26-16 Work Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/23/2016 9:54:10 AM
Creation date
9/23/2016 9:53:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Packet
CMO_Meeting_Date
9/26/2016
CMO_Effective_Date
9/26/2016
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
203
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
st <br />6.October 21work session, the proposed changes in building height diagram makes it look like <br />SW-SAZ is doing everyone a favor by decreasing building height. <br />Truth: <br />a.The diagram uses a mishmash of current zoning and Metro Plan designation, whichever <br />seems to make it look the most favorable in reducing heights. Two examples: <br />i.Portland Street between 24 th and 25 th is low density in Metro <br />plan, but R-2 in city zoning. The document uses the higher <br />density city zoning, so the height difference comes out the <br />same number of stories (3 to 3) rather than an increase in ½ <br />story (2.5 to 3). <br />ii.Willamette Street on the west side from West 23 rd to West <br />22 nd Avenues, the diagram shows a decrease of 8 stories (11 <br />to 3 stories). The current zoning is R-3 (limited to 50 feet, <br />which in other places is listed as 4.5 stories), and the Metro <br />Plan is high density which includes both R-3 and R-4. To make <br />the diagram more dramatic, the city selected the maximum <br />available height for R-4 at 11 stories. Because R-3 is used in <br />areas of Metro Plan high density designation, any honest <br />presentation would display this section as a maximum of only <br />4.5 stories. This is still a worthwhile decrease of 1.5 stories, <br />given the surround residential area, but it shouldn’t have been portrayed as an <br />8 story decrease. <br />b.Comparing the fixed feet in the current code with the “stories” in SW-SAZ land does not <br />tell the full story. For example: <br />i.The existing R-3 maximum height is 50 feet, not the 65 feet allowed for a 5- <br />story SW-SAZ apartment/condo building. <br />ii.Going from 50 feet to 65 feet is a 25% increase in height, yet miraculously this <br />comes out as only a “1/2 story increase” when comparing the current R-3 zone <br />(50 foot with 4.5 stories) to the proposed SW-SAZ apartment/condo zone (65 <br />foot 5-story SW-SAZ building). <br />iii.Most of the housing in SW-SAZ has 8 foot ceilings, so an extra 15 feet in height <br />would normally be adding closer to 2 stories. <br />iv.What is most significant in blocking solar access and visual openness is the <br />height of the building in feet – not the number of floors. <br />c.For mixed use area in SW-SAZ (such as Woodfield Station or the commercial strip along <br />Willamette), there is the potential for a 2-story bonus, given for “open space”. That <br />would make Woodfield Station area’s true maximum height for a height difference map <br />to be at 9 stories. Since in the SW-SAZ code 7 stories is a maximum of 90 feet high and 8 <br />stories is 105 feet high (a difference of 15 feet), then that would make 9 stories exactly <br />the same height that the SW-SAZ plan was supposedly protecting us from: 120 feet. <br />Currently, C-2 and R-4 maximum heights are 120 feet. <br />hy is 120 feet in current code coming out to be 11 stories, yet 120 feet in SW-SAZ <br />\[And w <br />land is only 9 stories? It shows the folly of comparing apples with oranges –aka feet in <br />the current code, and stories in SW-SAZ land.\] <br /> <br /> <br />Page 5 of 7 9/20/2016 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.