Laserfiche WebLink
enough single family. <br />Bonnie said that is silo thinking. In low density areas, we have large square foot houses. Each acre had <br />t are <br />already moderately dense? <br />Eliza Kashinsky said that medium density also has climate goals. All of the vacant lands are on the <br /> <br />Bonny said that this is new urbanism. Serve the new areas with transit. What is the reason to put <br />density in established neighborhoods? Why? Just to cash in on lower cost established areas? <br /> <br />Someone asked how many new units in SW-SAZ? <br />Terri said that in the capacity analysis, they used the number of 250, and to get this number, it required <br />development incentives. MUPTE requires a refinement plan in place to get additional density along <br />transit corridor. <br />Brian Weaver from West Eugene said when Greg Evans asked question at the City Council, the answer <br />was 50 to 250, so as low as 50. <br />Terri said that the question is what is the real number? <br />Joyce Eaton (Southeast Neighbors & FAN) said that the 250 number was only for the Mixed Use areas. It <br />said nothing about converting R-2 to R-3 and the additional units there. <br />\[ALSO, Joyce reminded Terri after the meeting ended, that the 250 number was based on residential <br />rental rate of $1.33 per square foot and that the one new construction Parvin Place at 24 th Place & <br />Willamette rented for $1.50 per square foot in 2014, so using that rental rate, the Capacity analysis said <br />there would be over 1300 new units again, just in Mixed use areas (and with MUPTE and reduced <br />. <br /> although HAVE they taken this point? They keep repeating the 250 <br />number without caveats.\] <br />Deborah Noble (Southeast Neighbors) said that people are going to drive anyway. Also South <br />. It is not like Highway 99. <br /> <br />s question (Terri read it): In the City Code Cthe purpose of the R-2 <br />Medium-Density Residential zone is to implement the Metro Plan by providing areas for medium- <br />density residential use and encourage a variety of dwelling types." It seems to me that R-2 is ideal for <br />implementing the "missing middle" of housing that is being talked about so much lately, and providing <br />the variety of housing types that you mentioned in one of FAN's SW-SAZ committee meetings. However, <br />every single one of the lots in SW-SAZ that was zoned R-2 in City of Eugene zoning (or zoned Medium <br />density in Metro Plan), was rezoned to Apartment/Condo (or multi-use) \[which is high density\]. Why did <br />the planning staff deem this nece <br />Terri answered that the intent was to have apartment/condo as a transition zone from commercial, then <br />apartment/condo, then lower level density. <br />be done by taking over existing R-s Mixed Use <br />Development Committee? There were 18 recommendations. Why were these ignored? <br />Terri said that there is a communication challenge. They were not intentionally ignored. It would have <br />helped to have a member of this committee. <br />Paul asked whether the city would engage in the future. <br />Terri said it would be good to do. <br /> <br />Page <br />. 6 of 9 SWN Conversation About Neighbhorhoods, 8/16/2016 <br /> <br />