My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-26-16 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Public Meetings
>
CMO
>
2016
>
09-26-2016
>
09-26-16 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/23/2016 10:15:07 AM
Creation date
9/23/2016 10:14:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Packet
CMO_Meeting_Date
9/26/2016
CMO_Effective_Date
9/26/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
132
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Oregons Marijuana Laws <br /> <br />enforce a local marijuana tax, the 2016 Legislature clarified that local governments may contract <br />with the Oregon Department of Revenue (DOR) to collect, enforce, administer, and distribute <br />locally-imposed marijuana taxes. (HB 4014, § 32). The League is working to develop a sample <br />contract that cities interested in contracting with DOR can use as a starting point in discussions <br />with the agency. <br />For those cities that enacted taxes on medical or recreational marijuana prior to the Legislature’s <br />adoption of ORS 475B.345, the status of those taxes remains an open question. Arguably, cities <br />that had “adopt\[ed\] or enact\[ed\]” taxes prior to the effective date of ORS 475B.345 are <br />grandfathered in under the law. However, the issue is not free from doubt, and cities that decide <br />to collect on pre-ORS 475B.345 taxes should be prepared to defend their ability to do so against <br />legal challenge. Consequently, cities that plan to continue to collect taxes imposed prior to the <br />passage of ORS 475B.345 should work closely with their city attorney to discuss the <br />implications and risks of that approach. <br />Ban on Early Sales <br />On October 1, 2015, medical marijuana dispensaries began selling limited quantities of <br />recreational marijuana. Cities may adopt an ordinance prohibiting those early sales without <br />referring the ordinance to voters and likely without tax implications. Although a city adopting an <br />ordinance “prohibiting the establishment” of certain marijuana activities is not eligible to receive <br />state marijuana tax revenues, an ordinance prohibiting early sales would merely limit the <br />activities at an existing medical marijuana dispensary. As a result, cities would likely remain <br />eligible to receive state tax revenues. <br />However, cities likely cannot impose a local tax on early sales. Under ORS 475B.345, cities <br />may not adopt or enact ordinances imposing a tax or fee on the production, processing or sale of <br />marijuana items, except as provided in that legislation. ORS 475B.345 further stipulates that <br />cities may refer an ordinance to voters imposing a tax of up to 3 percent on sales by a person that <br />holds a retail license issued by the OLCC. Because early sales of recreational marijuana will be <br />made by medical marijuana dispensaries, and not by a retail licensee, a city likely is preempted <br />from imposing a tax on early sales of recreational marijuana. However, cities interested in <br />imposing a local tax on early sales should consult their city attorney. <br />Ban on State-Registered and Licensed Activities <br />Under ORS 475B.800, cities may prohibit within the city the operation of recreational marijuana <br />producers, processors, wholesalers and retailers, as well as medical marijuana processors and <br />medical marijuana dispensaries. The lawis silent on whether a city can ban medicalmarijuana <br />growers, marijuana laboratories, and marijuana researchers from operating in the city. However, <br />ORS 475B.800 does not indicate that the bill’s process for banning marijuana activities is the <br />exclusive means to do so. Cities considering banning medical marijuana grow sites, marijuana <br />laboratories, or marijuana researchers should consult their city attorney about whether they can <br />do so under either home rule, federal preemption or both legal theories. <br />Local Government Regulation of Marijuana in Oregon League of Oregon Cities | 16 <br /> <br />May 2016 (Third Edition) <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.