Laserfiche WebLink
Oregon’s Marijuana Laws <br /> <br />Business License Ordinance <br />Although ORS 475B.800 provides an avenue for cities to ban certain marijuana activities, <br />nothing in the statutemakes that the exclusive means for prohibiting marijuana activities. As a <br />result, some cities may not need to go through the procedures outlined in ORS 475B.800 to ban <br />marijuana activities because they may already have laws in place that create an effective ban. <br />However, cities relying on other avenues to ban should be prepared to defend their authority to <br />do so. <br />A number of cities have imposed a ban through a local business license ordinance that provides <br />that it is unlawful for any person to operate a business within the city without a business license, <br />and further provides that the city will not issue a business license to any person operating a <br />business that violates local, state or federal law. Indeed, cities that have a business license <br />ordinance in place should review their existing codes to determine if such wording already <br />exists. Additionally, whether adopting a new business license program or amending an existing <br />one to provide that the city will not issue a business license to any person operating a business <br />that violates local, state or federal law, a city should work with its legal counsel to ensure that its <br />business license ordinance includes an enforcement mechanism to address a situation in which a <br />person is operating a business without a business license. <br />In addition, cities that decide to enforce a business license ordinance instead of adopting a ban <br />under ORS 475B.800 should consult their city attorney regarding City of Cave Junction v. State <br />of Oregon (Josephine County Circuit Court Case #14CV0588; Court of Appeals Case <br />#A158118) and Providing All Patients Access v. City of Cave Junction (Josephine County <br />Circuit Court Case #14CV1246, Court of Appeals Case #A160044). At issue in those cases is <br />whether the city of Cave Junction may enforce its business license ordinance, which prohibits <br />issuance of a business license to a business operating in violation of local, state or federal law, to <br />effectively prohibit medical marijuana dispensaries from operating. Two trial courts in Oregon <br />have upheld the city’s business license ordinance against challenges that it has been preempted <br />by the OMMA (prior to its amendment by HB 3400). Both of those cases currently are on <br />appeal before the Oregon Court of Appeals. <br />Development Code <br />Cities that desire to impose a prohibition on marijuana operations could also include in their <br />development codes a provision stating that the city will not issue a development permit to any <br />person operating a business that violates local, state or federal law. If not already defined, or if <br />defined narrowly, the city will want to amend its code to provide that a development permit <br />includes any permit needed to develop, improve or occupy land including, but not limited to, <br />public works permits, building permits or occupancy permits. <br />Land Use Code <br />As noted previously, state law places restrictions on where certain marijuana activities can <br />locate, including prohibiting certain processors, dispensaries and retail establishments from <br />Local Government Regulation of Marijuana in Oregon League of Oregon Cities | 18 <br /> <br />May 2016 (Third Edition) <br /> <br />