09-26-16 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

How would you work to make decisions as a board member given that there may be persons on the board whose views are methodology for expanding the pie to provide value for and gain invested interest from all adherents to a negotiated As a law student, much of my education centered around understanding the interests in and consequences of policy evidence-based practices. Every new law is, essentially, an experiment. The key is to be responsive by collecting data I am applying for the Toxics Board because I want to use my interdisciplinary background to provide public service in the conceptual spaces where scientific understanding is imperative for developing and implementing rational policy I am well versed in both chemistry and biology, having taught both at the university lever for years. This allows me to and regulations. The Toxics Board is a perfect example of the inextricable overlap of science and law, so it naturally I have experience working with multiple players to build consensus. Not all players must share interests to arrive at Access to information is essential, even to a fault, i.e. even if that information is difficult to interpret and can lead to costly misunderstanding. The first step is ensuring public access to information, and the second step is providing understand the chemical processes applied in industry and the risks posed to various organisms by the materials In general, I believe public access to information correlates directly to the potential for realizing true democracy. the same, mutually beneficial position. I've studied negotiation, and I am very much a proponent of the Harvard that indicates effectiveness and consequence, interpreting that data, and addressing both ineffectiveness and formation and implementation. As a scientist, I am experienced in research and data collection for developing outcome. In short, I am confident in my ability to be diplomatic and constructive in the face of adversity. Please describe your experience in the formation of or implementation of public policy and regulations. Please describe your familiarity with chemical substances and processes used in manufacturing. in direct opposition to yours? do you have any experience doing this? Please explain. Why did you apply for the Toxics Board, and what do you hope to contribute? Please describe your experience advocating for the public's right to know. Interested Applicants draws my interest as a place where I can be quite useful. context for properly understanding that information. FOR RIGHT-TO-KNOW ADVOCATES ONLY: FOR RIGHT TO KNOW ADVOCATES ONLY: used and produced in those processes. InterestedApplicants 7/6/2016 9:01:00 AM unintended consequences. Page 16 of 16 23456