My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item A - ICMA/PERF Report
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2005
>
CC Agenda - 03/09/05 WS
>
Item A - ICMA/PERF Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:57:10 PM
Creation date
3/2/2005 3:34:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
3/9/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
criteria and procedures in clear language as well as the consequences for not <br /> documenting or reporting inquiries. <br /> <br /> Discussion: There should be consequences for not documenting and reporting <br /> inquiries. While there are no foolproof ways, there are effective practices <br /> designed to cut down on covering up complaints and inquiries to suit the <br /> receiver's fancy. IA should send a letter to complainants advising them that <br /> the matter will be investigated. All complainants must be contacted within <br /> ten days of the receipt of the complaint, and investigations must be <br /> completed within thirty days. Complainants may also be offered the <br /> opportunity to have their complaint mediated by a qualified mediator rather <br /> than result in an investigation. <br /> <br /> Advisory No. 12: There is an assumption that there are some matters that are <br /> not considered suitable for mediation, regardless of how expedient the <br /> process might be. <br /> <br /> Discussion: Upon the conclusion of the complaint investigation and case <br /> resolution, complainants are notified of the outcome but they are not <br /> informed of the specific discipline imposed. Dissatisfied complainants can <br /> request a three-member panel review. When requested, the panel would <br /> consist of the employee's captain or manager, the police chief, and Human <br /> Resource Services's risk services manager. The value of this step for the <br /> complainant is unclear. The complainant is not required to attend, and the <br /> goal of the review is to assess the investigation in order to identify process <br /> problems that need to be addressed for the future. Complainants are advised <br /> that no finding or action already taken will change as a result of the review.TM <br /> <br />11 If the complainant is advised that nothing will be changed as a result of the review, what is the purpose of the <br />providing any information to the complainant? <br /> <br /> 79 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.