Laserfiche WebLink
ATTACHMENT C <br /> <br />Questions and Issues from February 16, 2005 Meeting: <br /> <br />1. What is the status of the railyard property? Should the property be included within the <br />proposed enterprise zone boundary? <br /> <br />The Union Pacific (UP) railyard property is a long narrow series of parcels consisting of approximately <br />277 acres. There is additional area, in various ownerships, of approximately 98 acres that adjoins the <br />yards and has historically been in rail related uses. This latter area is included within the recent <br />environmental studies on the railyards. <br /> <br />In recent discussions, UP staff reviewed some of the current thinking about the future of the railyard <br />property. The UP Real Estate Division, which is responsible for the sale of any surplus property, has not <br />had any of the railyard property released by Rail Operations for marketing and sales. There has, <br />however, been some discussion regarding the sale of a small, single parcel outside of the yards on the <br />north end of the site. UP Rail Operations is currently considering adding track capacity in the yards to <br />address operational issues and increasing regional demand. The remainder of the property is still under <br />consideration for future operational needs. UP Industrial Development staff reiterated this view, stating <br />that no properties within the yard have been made available for sale. Industrial Development staff <br />indicated that they are working with potential lease tenants that have proposed rail related uses (freight, <br />container handling) for portions of the yard property. <br /> <br />Inclusion of the UP railyard property in the proposed enterprise zone will not determine the future use of <br />the property. The railyard currently has no zoning designation, as rail lines are treated similar to public <br />right-of-way. The Metro Plan designates the railyard as suitable for heavy industrial. A formal zoning <br />process for railyard properties will need to occur prior to any future non-rail development of the <br />property. Determining the appropriate zoning and other necessary land use actions may be dependant, <br />in part, on the specific area of land to be sold and the redevelopment plan proposed by a future buyer. <br /> <br />Staff is recommending that the railyard property be included in the proposed enterprise zone boundary. <br />The enterprise zone program specifically prescribes the types of business activities (manufacturing, <br />processing, headquarters, distribution, warehousing, call-centers) that are eligible for tax exemption <br />benefits. If future zoning of the railyard property allows for business activities prescribed in the <br />enterprise zone program, the tax exemption benefits could be used to help offset the significant <br />redevelopment costs expected with this property. If future zoning does not allow for eligible enterprise <br />zone business activities, the tax exemption benefits would not be available even though the property is <br />included within the zone boundary. <br /> <br />2. What is the impact of applying the "job quality standards" (additional local criteria) to all <br />investments made within the proposed enterprise zone? <br /> <br />The Mayor's Committee recommended that job quality standards apply to investments occurring on <br />greenfield sites. Council discussed an alternative concept which would eliminate greenfield sites from <br /> <br /> <br />