Laserfiche WebLink
mile of the road itself, barring major features (such as the river) that would prevent <br />access to the key road. As half a mile is the typical distance that someone can walk in <br />10 minutes, this would mean that those who are part of the "20-minute neighborhood" <br />centered on the corridors would be represented in the initial process. <br />This does not mean that zoning or land use would necessarily change for that entire <br />area; the later localized processes would need to examine the specific characteristics <br />of each corridor to help determine what kind of growth makes sense in each area. <br />WHAT IS THE "LEXICON" AND HOW IS IT CONNECTED TO THIS <br />PROCESS? <br />In addition to clearer objectives, another area that has been identified as important to <br />support successful localized planning efforts is greater consistency and understanding <br />of terms and concepts related to the topics under consideration. Some concepts have <br />specific meaning in Eugene code, but these are not well-understood or always used <br />consistently. Other concepts and terms are frequently used as part of the discussion, <br />but are not well defined or understood the same way between different individuals and <br />groups. Examples include both concepts like "affordability," "low-income housing," <br />and "workforce housing," as well as specific terms for housing types and concepts-- <br />for example, when we discuss missing middle housing, what are we talking about? <br />Creating a lexicon, so that concepts and terms are more clearly defined and used <br />consistently between different plans and groups, as well as allowing reporting on <br />outcomes (for example, reports from the permitting department on units added) would <br />be a key tool to help ensure both the success of localized planning efforts and a clear <br />ability to determine if the plans created are successful at accomplishing their <br />goals. However, the process for creating the lexicon may need to be different than <br />that for determining the community objectives, given the different nature of the task. <br />HOW WAS THIS PROCESS CREATED? <br />Removing the South Willamette Special Area Zone from consideration lead to the <br />question "what comes next?" Discussions among many groups and individuals-- <br />those who opposed the SWSAZ, those who supported it, and those who had no strong <br />opinion about the SWSAZ but cared about the broader community goals-- indicated <br />that a step had been missed between the broad Envision Eugene process and the <br /> <br />