Laserfiche WebLink
review approvals that are considered as reviewed under the Type IV review process according to the requirements and criteria set forth for <br />part of another land use application shall be effective for the same time period as the <br />approvals shall be effective for 18 <br />not considered as part of <br /> <br />ATTACHMENT A <br />that time, the applicant shall submit a <br />The following applications are <br />final plan and an application for a development permit. Prior to the expiration date, the <br /> <br />Beginning Reference <br />applicant may submit a modification requesting a change to the commencement or <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />EC 9.8421EC 9.8060 <br />405. <br />Table 9.7405 Type IV Application Requirements and Criteria <br />each application as reflected in the beginning reference column in Table 9.7 <br /> <br /> <br />\] <br />Corrective <br />approvals <br /> <br />Legal <br /> <br /> <br />of such <br />. <br />Application Requirements and Criteria Reference <br /> <br />Type:Type: <br />\[ <br /> <br /> <br />and standards review <br />months after the effective date of approval. Within <br /> <br /> <br />standards <br />and modifications <br /> <br />mendment, Site Specific Change <br /> <br />Refinement Plan Amendment, Site Specific Change <br />review or <br /> <br /> primary land use application. <br />another land use application <br /> <br />ite review <br />Site <br />expiration time period. <br />s <br />\] <br />S <br />\[ <br /> <br />Type IV Applications <br />Approvals for <br />Code A <br /> <br /> <br />. <br />Land Use <br />Expiration <br />Type IV <br /> <br />Proposed Change:Proposed Change: <br /> <br />(6) <br /> <br />Type IV Application Requirements and Criteria <br /> <br />9.72309.7405 <br /> <br />site review or The proposed change processed currently with other land applications, as opposed to a Type V <br />rds review applications have <br />be submitted and approved before <br /> <br />expired, and new application must <br />, which are effective <br />n result in a <br /> <br />for adjustment reviews and traffic <br />consistent with state <br />planned unit development can be <br /> <br />is similar to that already provided <br />or legislative application process. <br />xpiration <br />development is in effect, but the <br />are <br />tandards <br />effective for 18 months. This is <br />law (and current practice), this <br />section needs to be revised to <br />subdivision or <br />situation where an approved <br /> <br />provide for site specific code <br />or planned unit <br />impact analysis applications <br />s <br />concurrently with tentative <br />approval <br />subdivision or planned unit <br />applications are processed <br />problematic when these <br />ments as Type IV <br />E <br />pplication <br />s <br />and <br />This ca <br />approved <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />eview application <br />use applications. <br />review <br /> <br />the concurrent <br />implemented. <br />for 36 months. <br />developments <br />To be <br /> <br />A <br />subdivisions <br />concurrent <br />Type II <br />ite <br /> <br />S <br /> <br />amend <br />standa <br />Issue:Issue: <br /> <br />14.15. <br /> <br />r <br /> <br />