Laserfiche WebLink
Fee examples for this year, based on the above: <br /> <br /> Without proposed ordinance With proposed ordinance <br /> Rate per FTE 2005 fee Rate per FTE 2005 fee <br />20 FTE $30.94 $618.80 $25.67 $513.40 <br />50 FTE $30.94 $1,547 $25.67 $1,283.50 <br />500 FTE $4 $2,000 $4 $2,000 <br /> <br />The research found that photo processors, dry cleaners, and crematories probably would not be required <br />to report, while some of the other businesses listed (in particular, gas stations, pool operators, and <br />possibly some auto body and paint shops) probably would be. <br /> <br />The estimated 2005 fee assumes an FY06 program budget of approximately $130,000, which includes <br />additional staff support and additional legal assistance for the initial fiscal year under the proposed new <br />scenario. It is possible that the necessity of this additional help may decline in future years, after the <br />program restabilizes. <br /> <br />To develop an actual 2005 fee recommendation under the proposed ordinance, it would be necessary to <br />specifically identify all businesses to be added to the program, poll them to determine their 2004 FTE <br />levels, add those FTE to the existing FTE pool, and then recalculate the FY06 program budget <br />requirements and applicable fees. 2005 billing would be delayed. <br /> <br />Under the proposed ordinance, initial fees for new businesses would be payable in 2005, but the first <br />reporting year would be 2006, meaning that the first reports for new participating businesses would not <br />be due to the City until April 2007. As was done in 1997 under the original program, the initial year <br />(2005) would be used to identify and educate affected businesses, who would then be required to track <br />substance use for the following year and report it by April 1 of the year after that. <br /> <br />If this ordinance is adopted, the Toxics Board also anticipates spending time in 2005 to work through the <br />various policy questions that will be raised, including treatment of mobile operators (contractors), <br />appropriate FTE allocations for businesses required to participate by virtue of only a part of their overall <br />operations, and other issues. <br /> <br />RELATED CITY POLICIES <br />A number of City policies are germane to this issue. The Toxics Program itself was enacted by <br />amendment to the City Charter in 1996. Previous City Councils have remained as faithful as possible to <br />the original intent of the voters in enacting the Amendment, adopting ordinances as necessary to <br />continue the program under altered circumstances created by litigation and legislation. The 2003-2004 <br />City Council Goals call for a safe community and for fair, stable, and adequate financial resources. <br />Finally, the City's 2005 Legislative Policies include support for legislative remedies to local Toxics <br />Program fee problems stemming from State law. <br /> <br /> L:\CMO\2005 Council Agendas\M050307\S0503076.doc <br /> <br /> <br />