My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 8 - Ratif.of IGR Actions
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2005
>
CC Agenda - 03/07/05 Mtg
>
Item 8 - Ratif.of IGR Actions
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:55:54 PM
Creation date
3/2/2005 3:49:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
3/7/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Bettman, seconded by Ms. Taylor, moved to change the status of the legislation to <br /> Monitor and to direct staff to send a letter expressing the committee's concerns about the <br /> proposed legislation to the Lane County delegation. The motion passed unanimously. <br /> <br /> Ms. Bettman, seconded by Ms. Taylor, moved to adopt the package of bills as amended. <br /> The motion passed unanimously. <br /> <br />4. Bills of Community Interest <br /> <br />Mr. Heuser referred the committee to a document entitled Bipartisan Legislation l/VouM Continue to <br />Provide Benefits to Oregon's Rural Schools, Communities. He said that the Secure Rural Schools and <br />Community Self-Determination Reauthorization Act of 2005 was on the United Front agenda. He recalled <br />that the committee chose not to act upon a resolution to support the legislation at its October 2004 meeting. <br />The bill was Lane County's top priority. <br /> <br />Responding to a question from Mr. Pap~, Mr. Heuser did not think Congress had any interest in revising the <br />bill to address local disputes regarding the allocation of funding. He noted that the jurisdictions did not <br />generally interfere with each other's priorities, even though, for example, Lane County did not particularly <br />like some of Eugene's priorities. <br /> <br />Mr. Jones called the committee's attention to the upcoming Lane County Roads Advisory Committee <br />meeting on February 23. He noted that City Manager Dennis Taylor and Springfield City Manager Mike <br />Kelly had sent an e-mail to all Lane County City administrators asking them to have their officials appear at <br />that meeting to discuss the distribution of funds as proposed in the Lane County Capital Improvement <br />Program. He believed a discussion of the line between supporting the federal legislation and the leverage <br />Eugene had with Lane County was a very ripe topic. <br /> <br />Mr. Heuser indicated that the City could approach the Congressional delegation again about the topic. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman recommended that Mr. Pap~ seek council direction regarding his discussions with the federal <br />delegation. She also recommended that Council President George Poling testify before the Roads Advisory <br />Committee about the City's road funding needs. <br /> <br />5. Salem Report <br /> <br />This item was not addressed. <br /> <br />6. Other Legislative Concerns <br /> <br />There were no other concerns raised by the committee or staff. <br /> <br />The meeting adjourned at 11:30 a.m. <br /> <br />(Recorded by Kimberly Young) <br /> <br />MINUTES--Council Committee on Intergovernmental Relations February 11, 2005 Page 9 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.