Laserfiche WebLink
force. She noted the proposed review had the support of the American Planning Association. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman recalled that the City's Legislative Policies included support for the State land use system. <br />Mr. Heuser pointed out that the legislation called for a task force. Ms. Bettman pointed out there was <br />mention of 'Gland use reform." Mr. Heuser said that the State frequently forms such task forces, and he <br />believed there was strong support for the legislation. Mr. Pap6 recalled that the governor had indicated there <br />would be a Department of Land Conservation and Development review, and asked why the legislation was <br />introduced. Ms. Muir said it was introduced at the governor's request. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman opposed the formation of the task force because the State already had bodies that had land use <br />expertise. <br /> <br />Mr. Heuser acknowledged Ms. Bettman's concerns but believed the legislature could interpret the City's <br />position as unwarranted interference in its affairs. He said that staff would continue to monitor the bill and <br />follow the development of the criteria for who would participate. <br /> <br />Mr. Pap~ suggested the committee retain the status of Monitor. Mr. Heuser said he would work to influence <br />the membership in a positive way. Ms. Bettman asked how members were to be appointed. Ms. Muir said <br />that the members would be appointed by the President of the Senate, the governor, and the Speaker of the <br />House. There were to be ten members, and they must be knowledgeable about Oregon's land use system <br />and familiar with the Oregon economic climate. Mr. Heuser indicated he would work with Ms. Muir to <br />develop language to add to the bill to create more balance. <br /> <br />Responding to a question from Ms. Taylor about SB 0089, related to custodial sexual misconduct, Mr. <br />Cushman clarified that the bill was intended to address the greater threat of coercion created by such <br />custodial situations. It was introduced at the request of the Department of Corrections. <br /> <br />Responding to a question from Ms. Bettman about SB 0096, which proposed to reduce the number of <br />hearings associated required to amend Statewide land use goals, Ms. Muir said the number would be <br />reduced from the two currently held in each of the State's five regions to one. It was based on the fact the <br />rules were already made. <br /> <br /> Ms. Bettman, seconded by Ms. Taylor, moved to change the status of the bill to Oppose. <br /> The motion passed unanimously. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman suggested that the City take a neutral position on SB 0101, relating to approach roads, unless <br />the bill evolved further. Mr. Jones had no objection given the bill had no impact on Eugene. <br /> <br /> Ms. Bettman, seconded by Ms. Taylor, moved to change the status of SB 0101 to Neutral. <br /> The motion passed unanimously. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman questioned why SB 0127, related to sex offender reporting, was not a higher priority. Mr. <br />Cushman had no objection to elevating the bill's priority status. <br /> <br /> Ms. Bettman, seconded by Ms. Taylor, moved to change the status of SB 0127 to Priority <br /> 1. The motion passed unanimously. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Council Committee on Intergovernmental Relations February 11, 2005 Page 7 <br /> <br /> <br />