My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 02/08/05 PS
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2005
>
CC Minutes - 02/08/05 PS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 10:28:15 AM
Creation date
3/4/2005 10:30:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Process Session
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/1/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Pryor said the principle was fine because the councilors were part of a larger representative body. <br /> <br />Mr. Papd suggested the following change to the second sentence of the second paragraph of Section 9.03: <br /> ~The Mayor or councilors should inform the other members of the City Council of the matters being <br />considered by the abe~ve ne~ted intergovernmental bodies, and to the greatest extent possible, seek direction <br />from the City Council on issues directly pertaining to the City of Eugene,,, ..... ~,,.o,,~:~*:~ and adopted city <br />policy." <br /> <br />Mr. Papd also recommended making the following change to the fourth sentence of the third paragraph: <br /> ~Ifthere is existing City or Council policy, the voting delegate should ~vill vote in accordance with that <br />policy." <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly noted that the council needed to adopt the revised agreements via resolution in a regular session, <br />but suggested the council move to approve the revision. <br /> <br /> Mr. Kelly, seconded by Mr. Poling, moved approval of the revisions, as <br /> discussed. The motion passed unanimously, 8:0. <br /> <br />Continuing, Mr. Pap6 underscored that microphone time continued to be an issue. He hoped the council <br />would be judicious with its time. He recalled a recent meeting at which members of the public who made <br />time to testify at a public hearing were turned away because the preceding items on the agenda took <br />too long due to copious discussion. <br /> <br />Ms. Ortiz said she did not feel compelled to weigh in on agenda items all of the time. She declared that <br />respect for public speakers was very important. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy commented that a tight schedule meant she should monitor and shorten comment time after the <br />Public Forum. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor reiterated her objection to ending meetings at 10 p.m. She thought this rushed some items, <br />adding that it was always better to postpone than to push something through without adequate discussion. <br />She preferred to shorten the council's response time to the Public Forum than the speaker's time to testify. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly agreed that the problem arose sometimes but did not think it was as ubiquitous as some people <br />thought it was. He pointed out that everyone was given an opportunity to speak in every round, should they <br />so choose. He felt that a new rule regarding microphone time was not needed, rather he thought a <br />combination of self-discipline and peer pressure, i.e., an after-meeting comment, would work to curtail <br />microphone abuse. He asserted the meeting cited by Mr. Pap6 had an over-full agenda. <br /> <br />Mr. Pryor said self-discipline would take care of the problem. He noted that most questions to staff could <br />be dealt with prior to meetings and then meetings could be solely for the purpose of deliberation and <br />comments. He remarked that he was unprepared to change the current system with time limits until he saw <br />how long some comments were and also how focused they were utilizing a greater degree of self-discipline. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman opined that more expository material in agenda packets would reduce the need for council <br />questions. She also wished that staff would limit its comments to its presentations. She said it had gotten to <br />the point where staff was participating in the decision-making process and did not have a timer. She <br />underscored her feelings that staff should be there to answer questions and not to exposit or rebut issues. <br /> <br />MINUTES-- Eugene City Council February 8, 2005 Page 4 <br /> Process Session <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.