Laserfiche WebLink
CE,O|CFFS|M2016 <br />ITY OF UGENEREGON ONSERVATION INANCE EASIBILITY TUDY AY <br />The Trust for Public Land is a national nonprofit land conservation organization working to protect <br />land for human enjoyment and well-being. The Trust for Public Land helps conserve land for <br />parks, greenways, recreation areas, watersheds and wilderness. Since 1972, the Trust for Public <br />Land has protected more than 3 million acres and completed more than 5,200 park and <br />conservation projects. To help public agencies or land trusts acquire land, the Trust for Public <br />Land’s Conservation Finance program assists communities in identifying and securing public <br />financing. The Trust for Public Land offers technical assistance to elected officials, public <br />agencies, and community groups to design, pass, and implement public funding measures that <br />reflect popular priorities. <br />Helping communities to secure dedicated conservation funding is often the tipping point that can <br />lead to deeper ecological responsibility, including more prudent land use, better managed growth, <br />and the increased protection of natural landscapes. To stimulate engagement across jurisdictions <br />and constituencies, the Trust for Public Land has historically found effective partnerships among a <br />broad spectrum of players, from the environmental left to the fiscally conservative right, and <br />recognizes that it is important to consistently explore new tools that can encourage and strengthen <br />the willpower of the voters to seek dedicated conservation funds. This focused, up-front investment <br />pays dividends over the long-term in voter-supported funding that is dedicated to conservation. <br />Since 1996, the Trust for Public Land has been involved in nearly 500 successful ballot measures <br />and 20 successful legislative campaigns that have created more than $57 billion in new funding for <br />parks, restoration, and land conservation. Voters have approved 81 percent of the ballot measures <br />assisted by the Trust for Public Land, including 12 successful measures in Oregon since 1996. <br />Recent successes include the passage of a $68 million bond for park improvements and upgrades in <br />the City of Portland in 2014, as well as the passage of a 5-year local option property levy of 9.6 <br />cents per $1,000 for park improvement, operations, and maintenance in the Portland Metro special <br />district in 2013.These measures passed with 74 and 56 percent support, respectively. In 2012, <br />voters in the Bend Park and Recreation District approved a $29 million bond for the purpose of <br />protecting natural areas, connecting trails, improving parks, and providing water safety. Also in <br />2012, a $20 million bond for the acquisition and improvement of parks, trails, watersheds, wildlife <br />habitat, and other natural areas was passed by voters in the Willamalane Park and Recreation <br />District. These measures passed with 52and 53 percent support, respectively. <br />The City of Eugene has asked the Trust for Public Land to explore public funding options available <br />for parks and recreationin the city. Given the substantial investment of time and resources required <br />for a successful conservation finance initiative, preliminary research is essential to determine the <br />feasibility of such an effort. This research provides a stand-alone, fact-based reference document <br />1,2 <br />that can be used to evaluate financing mechanisms from an objective vantage point. <br />If cityofficials decide to pursue a funding option, then such options should match political and <br />fiscal realities in the city. A possible next step could be testing voter attitudes toward a specific set <br />of funding proposals. The Trust for Public Land would then recommend conducting a public <br />opinion survey that tests ballot language, tax tolerance, and program priorities of Eugene voters. <br />1 <br />The contents of this report are based on the best available information at the time of research and drafting, March-April 2016. <br />2 <br />This feasibility study is not a legal document and should not be relied upon as a legal opinion. <br />TTPL::CFD5 <br />HE RUST FOR UBLIC AND ONSERVATION INANCE EPARTMENT <br /> <br />