My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 2A: Approval of City Council Minutes
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2006
>
CC Agenda - 06/12/06 Meeting
>
Item 2A: Approval of City Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:26:33 PM
Creation date
6/8/2006 10:40:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
6/12/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
averred that the auditor needed to ensure that the audit staff was properly trained in audit techniques and in <br />the roles they played in audit support. He felt the auditor needed to be able to enforce staff performance <br />and dependability. He recalled from his 30 years of serving as an auditor that it had been important that he <br />managed his staff and controlled the work environment. He listed three problem areas with an audit staff <br />reporting to an outside area: <br /> <br />? <br /> How would an audit staff lead keep abreast of the changes of growing the audit function into <br />maturity or expanding or narrowing its coverage as experience dictates? For the sake of efficiency <br />and cost-effectiveness, the audit process should have flexibility and constant self-evaluation. <br />? <br /> How would an outside audit staff boss manage to ensure maximum support for the work of the <br />auditor? He opined that an auditor’s needs would fall into a secondary priority with staff. <br />? <br /> How would an outside staff boss be equipped to deal with the critical issues of independent re- <br />cording of audit findings and insuring strict confidentiality of audit examinations and records? He <br />did not believe these functions worked successfully without hands-on staff guidance. <br /> <br />Additionally, Mr. Smith predicted the City would lose high-quality candidates for the auditor job if the <br />position did not include direct management of his or her staff. <br /> <br />Arnold Ismach <br />, 5326 Tahsili Street, agreed with Mr. Smith. He congratulated Mayor Piercy and the City <br />Council for moving ahead on schedule with the selection of an auditor. He felt the City was moving in the <br />right direction. He had followed the police auditor process closely. He noted that in his work as a <br />journalist he had come in contact with many police complaints. He recommended hiring someone with a <br />good legal background or background as a judge or professional negotiator. <br /> <br />Rob Handy <br />, 455 ½ River Road, opined that the election regarding the West Eugene Parkway (WEP) <br />divided the community and the vote to hire an independent police auditor could serve to “heal our <br />community.” He said the voters clearly decided to make the police auditor independent of the City <br />Manager and the Police Chief. He urged the City Council to move forward with what the voters asked for. <br /> <br />nd <br />Jana Jackson <br />, 1012 East 22 Avenue, expressed concern that the job description for the police auditor <br />was “light.” She asserted that there was no requirement that the auditor have a background in police work. <br />She felt it would be difficult for an auditor to judge the behavior of police officers without being familiar <br />with the law and its application. She likened it to having a plumbing inspector who knew little about <br />plumbing. She also found the requirement specifying that the auditor can not have worked for the EPD <br />within 20 years to be offensive. She suggested that five or ten years would be more reasonable. She <br />opined that to say a person should not be affiliated with the police department was “prejudicial and <br />offensive.” She felt that it implied EPD personnel, their friends, families, and associates could not be <br />trusted. <br /> <br />Majeska Seese-Green <br />, PO Box 11692, Eugene said the Whiteaker Community Council (WCC) held the <br />position that Eugene needed “the strongest possible” independent public review of police practices. She <br />stated that the auditor needed to be a person who would not be intimidated in “the real difficult situations <br />that might come up here in Eugene.” She averred that the person needed to have a documented history of <br />being able to stand up under those circumstances. She felt that setting up the auditor without complete <br />independence could hamper the situation. The WCC also wished to relay its concern that the person hired <br />be willing and able to supervise staff. She said it was hoped that an amendment to the charter could be <br />placed on the ballot with a change in wording that would clearly state that the auditor’s office should be <br />independent. She commented that, as there was an election scheduled already, an amendment would not <br />add to the expense. <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council May 8, 2006 Page 11 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.