Laserfiche WebLink
throughout the City. He did not think the current land bank sites presented a threat of any sort of <br />concentration of low-income housing in one area. <br /> <br />Councilor Solomon opined that this seemed to be more of a housekeeping issue as the repeal was tied to <br />incorporating the language into the Consolidated Plan. She indicated she would support the resolution. <br /> <br />Councilor Kelly questioned the necessity of getting rid of the Housing Dispersal Policy given that the low- <br />income census tracks were not likely to get much new housing. Mr. Weinman asked HPB chair, John <br />VanLandingham to respond. Mr. VanLandingham stated that a policy could be a bar. He recalled that the <br />Housing Dispersal Policy was originally, as conceived of in the 1970s, meant to encourage dispersal. Now, <br />he said, it was being used to block housing because of the way the numbers work in a particular <br />neighborhood and the way the policy counted families. He cited two recent examples of this, both in middle- <br />to high-income neighborhoods. <br /> <br />Councilor Kelly interjected that if the policy was being used as a bar, it should be fixed and not thrown out. <br />He felt if there was insufficient flexibility or not enough opportunity for the City Council to weigh in on a <br />Request for Proposal (RFP), then this should be addressed. Mr. Weinman pointed out that this was staff's <br />suggestion. Councilor Kelly called the resolution ~premature," as the language in the Consolidated Plan was <br />as yet unknown. He opined there was a big difference between a limit of 60 units and no limit at all. <br /> <br /> Roll call vote; the vote on Consent Calendar Item C was a tie, 3:3; <br /> councilors Poling, Pryor, and Solomon voting in favor and councilors <br /> Taylor, Kelly, and Ortiz voting in opposition. Mayor Piercy voted in <br /> opposition and the resolution failed on a final vote of 4:3. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy said the resolution could wait and could be done in a way that would be right for everyone. <br />She expressed concern regarding how housing dispersal affected the achievement gaps in schools. <br /> <br />City Manager Taylor underscored that this was not a time-critical issue. He said staff would make the next <br />review of the item coincide with the specific language in the Consolidated Plan. <br /> <br />3. PUBLIC HEARING: <br /> An Ordinance Establishing the S-HJM Historic Johansen-Moody House Special Area Zone and <br /> Amending the Eugene Zoning Map <br /> <br />City Manager Taylor asked PDD Associate Planner Kent Kullby to speak about this item. <br /> <br />Mr. Kullby explained that the council had been asked to consider the adoption of a Special Area Historic <br />Zone for a City landmark located at 370 River Road. He noted this was the second public hearing on this <br />item, the first having been heard by the Planning Commission. There were no objections to the change in <br />zoning to date, and the Planning Commission had recommended approval. He said the approval criteria <br />were in the City Council agenda packet. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy outlined the procedure for testimony. She opened the public hearing. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council January 10, 2005 Page 11 <br /> Regular Session <br /> <br /> <br />