Laserfiche WebLink
ordinance that would incorporate the current administrative rule regarding outdoor smoking structures into <br />the code. She called the incorporation of the rule a "step backwards." <br /> <br />Kevin Franken, 2646 Gay Street, strongly supported amending the ordinance to maintain 25 feet between <br />smoking areas and public buildings, including windows and air intakes. He related that he was very allergic <br />to cigarette smoke and this had caused him a great deal of discomfort while attending the University of <br />Oregon Law School. He said many times he had been forced to walk around to other exits because of <br />congregating cigarette smokers by the doors. He noted a previous speaker had said that cigarette smoke did <br />not know how to stay in the smoking section and shared the following quote, which he had found on the <br />internet: "Having a smoking section in a workplace is like having a peeing section in a swimming pool." He <br />stressed that cigarettes were the only product that, when used as directed, would kill a person. He pointed <br />out that entertainer Johnny Carson had just died from emphysema related to cigarette smoking. <br /> <br />Julia Martin, 1013 Tiara Street, thanked the council for passing "this important piece of public health <br />legislation" in 2000. She wished to thank the council in particular for protecting those who were most <br />exposed, those working in restaurants and bars. She stated that when the laws were passed there were only <br />16 cities, including Corvallis, with comprehensive smoke-free indoor workplace laws. She said since those <br />laws were passed, 80 more municipalities had passed such laws. She related that, in spite of efforts by the <br />tobacco industry, the States of Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Massachusetts, New York, and California <br />had passed laws making indoor workplaces smoke-free. She noted that Ireland, Norway, and New Zealand <br />had also passed such laws and countries such as Great Britain and Italy were in the process of enacting <br />smoke-free laws. She noted that regulations in dozens of communities made smoking in parks and on <br />playgrounds off limits. She supported the expansion of the ordinance language and echoed the opposition of <br />previous speakers to the incorporation of the administrative rule regarding outdoor smoking areas into the <br />code. <br /> <br />Susan Planner, 1788 Riverview Street, worked as a respiratory therapist. She explained that her job <br />focused primarily on providing therapy for people with chronic breathing problems. She related that many <br />of the people that she treated had tobacco-related diseases. She was grateful to the council for passing the <br />ordinance in 2000, stating that it had improved work places for many citizens. She commented that she had <br />been a volunteer for the American Lung Association and had heard people speak of how wonderful it was to <br />be able to go to smoke-free clubs and how wonderful it was for oxygen-assisted people to go out without the <br />worry of having a combustible gas around smoking. <br /> <br />Ms. Pfanner felt, however, that the second portion of the proposed ordinance was a step in the wrong <br />direction. She declared smoke-free legislation to be the trend of the future. She said she was proud to be <br />from a City that was in the forefront of such legislation. <br /> <br />Grant Higginson, 800 Northeast Oregon Street, Portland, stated that he was the State Public Health Officer <br />with Department for Health and Human Services (DHHS). He said he performed a number of roles, one of <br />which was to monitor the enforcement of Oregon's Indoor Clean Act, passed in 2001 that prevented all <br />indoor smoking with the exception of smoking sections in bars and all bingo halls. He complimented the <br />City of Eugene on its progressive ordinance. However, he expressed concern that the language regarding <br />outdoor smoking areas in the proposed ordinance could violate both the spirit and the letter of the law. He <br />thought structures could be constructed that would be completely legal in the city of Eugene but would be in <br />conflict with State law. He wished to avoid a situation wherein businesses believed they were constructing <br />perfectly legal outdoor smoking structures only to be sanctioned for them once they were completed. He <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council January 24, 2005 Page 9 <br /> Regular Session <br /> <br /> <br />