Laserfiche WebLink
31 <br />ATTACHMENT A: <br /> page of 40 <br /> <br />3. An applicant can seek an adjustment to the requirement that all pollution reduction facilities must <br />be selected, sited and constructed in accordance with the Stormwater Management Manual and that <br />all facilities must be designed using one of the three methodologies outlined in the Manual if all of the <br />following requirements are met: (1) the proposed alternative design will achieve equal, or superior, <br />results for reducing pollution, maintainability and safety and the proposed siting does not adversely <br />affect structures or other properties; (2) the applicant’s written description of the proposed alternative <br />design has been reviewed and approved by the City Engineer; (3) the applicant has submitted a <br />method and schedule for monitoring the effectiveness of the proposed design; and, (4) the applicant <br />has submitted a signed statement that the applicant will replace the alternative facility if the facility <br />does not function as proposed. <br /> <br />4. An applicant can seek an adjustment to the requirement that the applicant demonstrate that peak <br />rates of flow delivered to an existing open waterway at a point above 500 feet will not increase during <br />storms larger than the water quality design storm and smaller than the flood control design storm as a <br />result of the subject development if the proposed flow control facility will control flow rates as much <br />as possible and one of the following applies: (1) the area generating untreated runoff is less than 500 <br />square feet of impervious surface and is isolated from the flow control facility; (2) the area generating <br />runoff is less than 500 square feet of impervious surface and it is not technically feasible to drain the <br />untreated runoff to the pollution reduction facility; (3) constructing pollution reduction facilities to <br />treat the runoff from the area at issue would require removal of trees or damage other natural <br />resources; or, (4) the area generating untreated runoff is less than 500 square feet of impervious <br />surface and limited access to the area would prevent regular maintenance of the flow control facility. <br /> <br />5. An applicant can seek an adjustment to the requirement that all flow control facilities must be <br />selected from and sited, designed and constructed according to the Stormwater Management Manual <br />if all of the following requirements are met: (1) the proposed alternative design will achieve equal, or <br />superior, results for reducing pollution, maintainability and safety and the proposed siting does not <br />adversely affect structures or other properties; (2) the applicant’s written description of the proposed <br />alternative design has been reviewed and approved by the City Engineer; (3) the applicant has <br />submitted a method and schedule for monitoring the effectiveness of the proposed design; and, (4) the <br />applicant has submitted a signed statement that the applicant will replace the alternative facility if the <br />facility does not function as proposed. <br /> <br />6. An applicant can seek an adjustment to the requirement that all oil control facilities be sited, <br />designed and constructed according to the Stormwater Management Manual if the applicant can <br />demonstrate that the selected oil control facility will achieve the same result as those listed in the <br />Manual. <br /> <br />7. An applicant can seek an adjustment to the requirement that all source controls be sited, designed <br />and constructed according to the Stormwater Management Manual if the applicant can demonstrate <br />that the selected source control will achieve the same result as those listed in the Manual. <br /> <br /> <br />Exhibit A to Ordinance No. ___ <br />Findings of Consistency <br /> <br />