My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 9: Ordinance Concerning Stormwater Development Standards
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2006
>
CC Agenda - 06/12/06 Meeting
>
Item 9: Ordinance Concerning Stormwater Development Standards
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:56:39 PM
Creation date
6/8/2006 11:20:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
6/12/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
95
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />many residents in our area with well water. Washington state has soil best <br />management practices in its stormwater code for just this purpose. <br /> <br />The work of the RR/SC Transition Team has identified these same issues as critical to <br />this area. The outcome of their work supports this request for preservation and <br />enhancement of the open waterways and the listed contributing factors for the continued <br />successful functioning of our natural stormwater system. <br />Finally, we ask that the 3,000 square foot threshold for applicability of the proposed <br />standards be reduced to 1,000 square feet. Portland (the city you are striving to model <br />this plan after) has a 500 square foot threshold. Aiming to be only half as effective <br />should take us a long way toward improving our water quality. <br /> <br />Thank you for your consideration. Below I have included some examples of existing <br />code language from other municipalities that closely parallel our goals for the Eugene <br />stormwater code and will inform our work in creating language for Eugene's ordinance <br />over the next two weeks. <br /> <br />Sincerely, <br />Kate Perle <br /> <br />The Pierce County Ordinance from the Puget Sound area outlining many of the <br />same concerns of RR/SC basin. (Pierce County ordinance--page 9) Low impact <br />development goal shall be achieved through adherence to the following <br />objectives... "retain or restore native soils and vegetation on 65% of a site. limit effective <br />impervious area to no more than 1 0%. retain and incorporate natural site features that <br />promote infiltration of storm water on a developed site. use of traditional conveyance and <br />pond technologies to manage storm water quality and quantity should only be considered <br />after all other LID techniques have been considered and used to the greatest extent <br />possib'e <br /> <br />Soils for Salmon.org outlines reasons to include soil protections instormwater <br />ordinances and highlights Washington's soils BMPs.As land use intensifies, <br />surface water runoff increases and evapotranspiration diminishes. This pattern is <br />common in the urban environment and highlights the need for creative alternative~ <br />that can help reduce water runoff and increase groundwater infiltration in the face of <br />continued growth. It is widely recognized that urbanization brings increased peak <br />storm flows and decreased summer flows to streams. This results from the increase in <br />impervious surface and decrease in groundwater infiltration. It has been clearly <br />demonstrated that minimizing development impact on native soils and forests, and <br />restoring impacted soils with compost, can reduce peak storm flows and increase <br />infiltration. <br /> <br />Soil Best Management Practices <br />Recently Washington State has included soil BMPs (Best Management Practices) in <br />their stormwater manual. Snohomish County has funded creation of an simple and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.