Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Comments on Stormwater Development Ordinance and Stormwate <br /> <br />Page 3 of 6 <br /> <br />Unfortunately, the proposed stormwater development ordinance and Manual have no provisions that <br />specifically address the unique characteristics of our area, nor any special development standards that <br />aim to protect the natural drainage system in our neighborhood. Our neighborhood is slated for a high <br />development density. The draft Basin Plan projects that at UGB buildout, impervious surface in our <br />Basin is expected to "increase to 51 percent, which is the highest for all of the basins." <br /> <br />Can our "country drainage" system continue to function at this percentage of impervious surface? Alas, <br />our Basin Plan is not complete, and drainage modeling is unverified. None of the water quality testing <br />that has been used to develop the plan has been done in our area at all. According to the draft text <br />(Initial Study Towards the Development of a Stormwater Basin Master Plan), feasibility and cost <br />analysis of proposed water quality standards and capital projects have not been completed. <br /> <br />Staff have suggested that this stormwater development ordinance and Stormwater Management Manual <br />can be adopted separately from the Basin Plans, but something is wrong with this picture. Each Basin <br />Plan contains proposed development standards ostensibly based on characteristics and needs of the <br />Basin, and aimed at controlling flooding and preserving water quality. Surely it is those proposed <br />development standards that are, or should, be the basis for these city-wide development standards. A <br />schematic and text at the start of the draft Basin Plan describes such a process--adoption of stormwater <br />development standards and best management practices manual AFTER completion of Basin Master <br />Plans and integrated stormwater management strategies. <br /> <br />In any case, the public has not had the opportunity to comment on the proposed development standards <br />in the draft River Road-Santa Clara Basin Plan. There needs to be a more thorough review of these <br />standards in light of the unique characteristics of our Basin and natural drainage system, and the City's <br />development code may need to be amended in the future with provisions protective of our Basin. <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />Comments on Specific Sections of Stormwater Ordinance and Stormwater <br />Management Manual: <br /> <br />These comments address various sections of the ordinance (and relevant sections of the Manual): <br />Definitions, destination (flood control), pollution reduction (water quality), flow control (stream bed. <br />protection), and drainage ways section of Manual. <br /> <br />Definitions <br /> <br />More work is needed to clarify the definitions of Runoff and Stormwater. <br /> <br />Runoff is not defined in the ordinance, but is defined in the Stormwater Management Manual as <br />"Stormwaterflows across the ground surface during and after a rainfall event." But shouldn't runoff also <br />include water flows across ground caused by human activities, such as car washes? <br /> <br />The Manual defines "stormwater" as "water runoff that originates as precipitation on a particular site, <br />basin, or watershed. " <br /> <br />In contrast, according to the Eugene Public Works web site, "stormwater" is water that flows across the <br />land -- and it is not limited to what falls from the sky. It includes water that runs off any hard surface, <br />from roads to roofs..." <br /> <br />The ordinance itself does not have a definition of "stormwater". It probably should. Also, the source <br /> <br />5/23/2006 <br />