My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCAgenda-3/10/04WS
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2004
>
CCAgenda-03/10/04WS
>
CCAgenda-3/10/04WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:13:01 PM
Creation date
3/5/2004 9:34:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda
CMO_Meeting_Date
3/10/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
21 The r,;,., ^~: v:,,o~,~ a~.~- e .... et Field Ai~og Noise Exposure <br /> ~ ..... ~ ..... ~-' ly April 2000 ........... ~ n~n was found to be <br /> .... v ........... ~ Ana sis, x, ..... ~ ~, <br /> in compliance with state ~og noise st~d~ds by the State of Oregon <br /> p~ Q lity' t ....... ~n~ <br /> De ment of Environmental ua :n ...... j ..... <br /> <br /> b. Proposed Amendments to Existing Goal 6 Policy #1 <br /> Issue: Amend existing Policy 1 (new policy C.25 on page 23 of Exhibit B) as <br /> follows: <br /> "Springfield, Lane County, and Eugene shall consider downstream impacts for <br /> water quality when planning for urbanization, flood control, urban storm runoff, <br /> recreation, an~ water qt:a!/ty and recreational needs in near proximity to ~ the <br /> Willamette and McKenzie Rivers." <br /> <br /> Staff Analysis: The proposed changes would limit the consideration of <br /> downstream impacts to only those that affect water quality. The existing policy <br /> language already addresses water quality and is worded to allow broader <br /> consideration of downstream impacts. <br /> <br /> Recommendation: No change. <br /> <br /> c. Proposed Amendments to Existing Policy 36 <br /> Issue: Amend existing Policy 36 (new policy C.29 on page 24 of Exhibit B) as <br /> follows: <br /> "The air, water, and land resource quality of the metropolitan area has not been <br /> assessed since adoption of the Metro Plan in 1982. Prior to the completion of the <br /> next Metro Plan update, the air, water, and land resource quality of the <br /> metropolitan area w;.!! mus~t be assessed." <br /> <br /> Staff Analysis: The first sentence of the proposed amendment to existing policy <br /> 36 is a finding, and not appropriate language for a policy. A number of studies <br /> have been completed that address air, water, and land resource quality for various <br /> portions of the metro area, although there has not been a systematic metro-wide <br /> assessment. Proposed amendments to existing air quality findings 4, 5, and 6 <br /> (new findings 26 and 27 on pages 23 and 24 of Exhibit B) update references to the <br /> status of air quality in the metro area. <br /> <br /> The proposed verb change from "will" to "must" would not change the meaning <br /> nor effect of the existing policy. <br /> <br /> Recommendation: No change. <br /> <br />Metro Plan Periodic Review Text and Diagram Amendments Staff Notes Page 18 of 28 <br /> City Council Agenda page 320 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.