My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCAgenda-3/10/04WS
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2004
>
CCAgenda-03/10/04WS
>
CCAgenda-3/10/04WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:13:01 PM
Creation date
3/5/2004 9:34:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda
CMO_Meeting_Date
3/10/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
specificity, such as zoning ordinances and maps, and other methods for implementing <br /> the plans'provisions. Nothing in the text of Goal 2 appears to require comprehensive <br /> land use plans and their use designation maps be parcel-specific. <br /> <br /> ORS chapter 197 supports the conclusion that the comprehensive plan is not intended <br /> to be the most specific land use planning document, but rather a more generalized <br /> document that does not require a parcel-specific map of use designations. In addition, <br /> several cases that discuss comprehensive plans provide support for the proposition <br /> that comprehensive pans are to be general in nature. <br /> <br /> It is important to note that current adopted inventories are among the criteria that <br /> guide the interpretations. Staff would provide a recommendation that is based on an <br /> analysis of the criteria stated in the Metro Plan Housekeeping Revisions pages II-G-1 <br /> and 2 (i.e., Metro Plan designation descriptions, Metro Plan policies, adopted <br /> buildable lands inventory analyses, refinement plans, and local codes) in determining <br /> the appropriate Plan designation of parcels that border more than one Plan designation <br /> within the metropolitan UGB, as follows: <br /> <br /> "The Diagram's depiction of land use designations is not intended to invalidate <br /> local zoning or land uses which are not sufficiently intensive or large enough to <br /> be included on the Metro Plan Diagram. <br /> <br /> The Plan designation of parcels in the Metro Plan Diagram is parcel-specific in <br /> the following cases: <br /> <br /> 1. Parcels shown on the Metro Plan Diagram within a clearly identified Plan <br /> designation, i.e., parcels that do not border more than one Plan <br /> designation; <br /> 2. Lands outside the UGB within the Metro Plan boundary; <br /> 3. Parcels with parcel-specific designations adopted through the citizen- <br /> initiated Plan amendment process; <br /> 4. Parcels shown on a parcel-specific refinement plan map that has been <br /> adopted as an amendment to the Metro Plan Diagram. <br /> <br /> There is a need for continued evaluation and evolution to a parcel-specific <br /> diagram. The Metro Plan designation descriptions below, Metro Plan policies, <br /> adopted buildable lands inventory analyses, refinement plans, and local codes <br /> provide guidance to local jurisdictions in determining the appropriate Plan <br /> designation of parcels that border more than one Plan designation within the <br /> metropolitan UGB." <br /> <br /> These interpretations would occur as part of a process to change the zoning on <br /> specific parcels, and, less frequently, for subdivisions and conditional use permits. <br /> Staff would make findings of Metro Plan consistency for subdivisions and conditional <br /> use permits, as well as zone changes which are approved by the hearings officials. In <br /> <br />Metro Plan Periodic Review Text and Diagram Amendments Staff Notes Page 21 of 28 <br /> City Council A§enda page 323 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.