Laserfiche WebLink
Steve Johnson, 1825 Longview Drive, stated that he was a member of the Toxics Board. He urged <br />adoption of the unanimously approved recommendation before the council. He commented that, <br />when moving forward with the law, it was not thought that it would solve all problems with toxins <br />in Eugene. He felt the time had come to make a proposal for a way to improve the law. He <br />indicated, with a chart, that expanding the businesses required to report to those with less than ten <br />employees, noting that businesses such as dry cleaning and auto body paint shops put toxic <br />materials into the environment. He asserted this would add to the base of people to support the <br />program. He added that the program had reached a point wherein the facilitation of reporting had <br />greatly improved. <br /> <br />Bob O' Brien, 3525 Gilham Road, made the following points: <br /> <br /> 1) Many people worked a great deal to gather the signatures needed to put the Toxics Right- <br /> To-Know law on the ballot. He noted he had participated in the petition drive. The law was <br /> very important to a lot of people. <br /> <br /> 2) He urged the council to keep the fees the way they are in the proposal. He commented <br /> that the board was a balanced body and had come forth with a good proposal. <br /> <br />3) He thanked the City Council for upholding the City Charter. He thanked Mayor Torrey <br />for upholding the law supported by the citizens of Eugene. He noted the City had sent its <br />lobbyist to Salem to lobby on behalf of the law. <br />In closing, he urged the council to support the recommendation for the increase in hazardous <br />substance user fees for 2004. <br /> <br />David Monk, 3720 Emerald Street, speaking as the third citizen representative on the Toxics <br />Board, stressed that the ordinance had been passed by a 55 percent majority. He averred that the <br />voters clearly understood that ~ignorance was toxic." He opined that the funding challenges faced <br />by the Toxics Right-To-Know law were a direct result of business owners' opposition to <br />democracy. He commented that the city councilors represented people impacted by industry. He <br />likened the decision before the council as that of being for the ~protection the health of our <br />youngest and most vulnerable citizens" or for the industry's ~right to pollute." He asked the <br />council to adopt the recommendation for the fee structure brought before it by the Toxics Board, <br />reiterating that it had been forwarded by unanimous vote. <br /> <br />Hope Marston, PO Box 51434, 3110 University Street, proclaimed her pride in living in a <br />community in which the citizens had passed the Toxics Right-To-Know law. She lauded the <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council February 23, 2004 Page 5 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br /> <br />