My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 05/08/06 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2006
>
CC Minutes - 05/08/06 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 10:28:30 AM
Creation date
6/30/2006 3:47:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
5/8/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
runoff from impervious surfaces. She stated that River Road drainage was handled by bioswales. She also <br />wanted to review the stormwater basin master plan for the area. <br /> <br />Rob Handy <br />, 455 ½ River Road, submitted his testimony in writing. He asserted that the proposed <br />stormwater ordinance and related Stormwater Manual had significant implications for development and the <br />related urbanization that “results from development.” He said staff had done a great job of educating the <br />neighborhood organizations and others in an effort to inform citizens about the proposed policies. He also <br />wished for the record to remain open, as the review and preparation of comments had “proven to be <br />complex and time-consuming.” He averred that citizens from the River Road area wanted to offer “useful <br />and reasonable” suggestions for improvements specific to the area’s basin plan. They had been challenged <br />to do so because the issues were complicated. He shared two examples of issues of concern: <br /> <br />? <br /> Section 1.4(2) which outlined “destination design methodology” and which indicated that the City <br />of Eugene developed flood control strategies for each of the drainage basins within the urban <br />growth boundary (UGB) and published its findings, though he alleged that no strategy had been <br />adopted for the River Road/Santa Clara basin; therefore the flood control design storm information <br />did not have the necessary data to formulate the desired level of protection for the neighborhood. <br />? <br /> Section 2.2(1) which outlined the “simplified design methodology approach” and stated that a <br />simplified approach was a process for selecting and designing combined pollution reduction and <br />flow control facilities intended to save the project developer time and expense. He suggested in- <br />cluding language that addressed the intent of the simplified design methodology and encouraged <br />implementation of “natural systems’ functions where appropriate.” <br /> <br />Mr. Handy thanked councilors Ortiz and Papé for their interest in the transition team issues for the <br />neighborhood. <br /> <br />Kate Perle <br />, 4740 Wendover Street, reiterated concern that the stormwater basin master plan for the River <br />Road/Santa Clara was incomplete. She surmised the plan could ultimately dictate how the neighborhood <br />dealt with stormwater. She averred that the stormwater basin in that neighborhood was “distinctly <br />different” from the other basins in the city. She said it was important that the considerations given to the <br />headwaters area in the ordinance as written be allowed for other sensitive basins as well. She called it a <br />“red flag” for her that much of the language in the manual intended to create systems and to build systems <br />that “mimic” natural stormwater conveyance, filtration, and mitigation. She preferred to preserve what <br />already existed. She averred that the River Road/Santa Clara area had stormwater systems designed by <br />nature that she felt were “priceless.” She asserted that they performed at significantly higher levels than <br />man-made replacements. She applauded areas of Washington that utilized best management practices for <br />preserving native soils and vegetation. <br /> <br />Tammie Stark <br />, 843 Snell Street, stated that she was a rainwater harvesting consultant. She provided <br />handouts regarding her work. She agreed with testimony in support of preservation of natural systems that <br />were “already taking care of stormwater mitigation.” She supported the stormwater plan with the <br />exception of the reporting requirements. She alleged that she heard from “some professionals” that such <br />requirements were burdensome for them and expensive for clients. She wished to note, regarding rainwater <br />harvesting, that an outcome-based policy would be greatly advantageous as opposed to a prescriptive <br />policy. She believed it was important to have practitioner collaboration when reviewing code. She offered <br />to provide free student labor through the Lane Community College Rainwater Harvesting Design and Build <br />workshop, scheduled for this summer. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council May 8, 2006 Page 14 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.