Laserfiche WebLink
between the request and timing of the council’s decision to place a local option levy on the ballot to present <br />such a plan. He said that based on the council’s direction during the past year, staff proceeded on the <br />assumption that renewal of the levy would be recommended to the voters. <br /> <br />Mr. Papé asked what the last possible date was for referring the levy to the voters. City Manager Taylor <br />said it was the council’s last meeting before its break in early August. <br /> <br />Mr. Papé, seconded by Ms. Solomon, moved to table the matter until the council’s last <br />meeting in July 2006 in order to obtain more information on a plan to integrate library op- <br />erations into the budget. <br /> <br />Ms. Ortiz commented that action in July left little time to mount a campaign for a successful levy election. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly echoed Ms. Ortiz’s concern and said that the intended amendment by Ms. Bettman, which was <br />distributed to the council, might address Mr. Papé’s concerns about a plan to transfer library services to the <br />budget over the levy’s four-year period. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman also agreed with Ms. Ortiz regarding timing and said that her amendment would require <br />transfer of library services to the City’s General Fund over a four-year period and embed that intent in the <br />resolution and levy language. <br /> <br />Mr. Papé did not feel that waiting until July to take action would jeopardize the success of the levy as it was <br />no surprise to the voters that a third library local option levy was being put forward. <br /> <br />The motion to table failed, 2:6; Mr. Papé and Ms. Solomon voting in favor. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman, seconded by Mr. Papé, moved that recital C be amended and a new recital D <br />be added to the resolution to read: <br /> <br />C. On May 22, 2006, the City Council agreed that a four-year Local Option Levy of <br />$2,687,500 per year should be placed on the November 7, 2006 ballot. The proposed <br />levy would renew a part of the Library Local Option Levy currently on the tax bills of <br />Eugene taxpayers in order to continue current library services. The median Eugene <br />taxpayer will pay an average of $35 per year over the four year period of the levy. <br /> <br />D. It is the intention of the City Council that library services will be transferred from <br />the Library Local Option Levy to the General Fund over the four-year period of this <br />Local Option Levy. By FY12, library operations will be entirely funded in the City’s <br />General Fund. <br /> <br />and that Section 1 be amended by deleting “$.041 per $1,000 of assessed value” and in- <br />serting “$2,687,500 per year.” <br /> <br />Speaking to the motion, Ms. Bettman said the library was an outstanding asset, the services it provided were <br />excellent, and there was great community support for it. She believed that continuing to rely on levies to <br />fund library ongoing services placed the library and those services at risk. She said the issues were <br />thoroughly discussed during the budget process and a majority of Budget Committee members agreed with <br />the City’s stated and adopted financial policy that ongoing services should not be funded through a levy, but <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council May 22, 2006 Page 7 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br />