My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 2A: Approval of City Council Minutes
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2006
>
CC Agenda - 07/10/06 Meeting
>
Item 2A: Approval of City Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:26:49 PM
Creation date
7/3/2006 3:10:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
7/10/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilor Solomon, seconded by Councilor Ortiz, moved to adopt Resolution 4879 <br />certifying that the City of Eugene provides the municipal services required by Ore- <br />gon Revised Statutes Section 221.760. Roll call vote; the motion passed unani- <br />mously, 8:0. <br /> <br />Councilor Solomon, seconded by Councilor Ortiz, moved to adopt Resolution 4880 <br />adopting the Budget, making appropriations, determining, levying and categorizing <br />the annual Ad Valorem Property Tax Levy for the City of Eugene for the Fiscal <br />Year beginning July 1, 2006, and ending June 30, 2007. <br /> <br />Councilor Solomon, seconded by Councilor Poling, moved to amend the motion by <br />eliminating the appropriation for additional City Council staff and the reprioritiza- <br />tion of $70,000 of the General Fund’s Capital transfer for the creation of council of- <br />fices. Specifically, she moved to reduce the General Fund appropriation for the <br />Central Services Department by $70,000 to increase the Reserve for Revenue Short- <br />fall by the same amount, and to remove any directive to create council offices using <br />General Capital resources. <br /> <br />Councilor Solomon conveyed her concern that the appropriation for councilor offices and support staff <br />passed without thoughtful analysis and discussion. She was very aware of how constrained space was in <br />City Hall. She said the item only received five minutes of discussion late in the evening and two councilors <br />were not present. She submitted that the council had a shared office and if councilors needed office hours <br />then they should develop a schedule for the current office. She noted that the council was slated to receive <br />offices in the new City Hall. She felt retrofitting the existing building was not a thoughtful way to use City <br />money. <br /> <br />Councilor Kelly opposed the amendment. He had been dismayed by what he considered to be “an <br />orchestrated email campaign” on the issue. He wished to make it clear that the councilors would receive a <br />room with partitions. He asserted that councilors spent 20 to 50 hours a week and as such he did not think <br />it was unreasonable to want a desk, a phone, and someone to answer the phone. He acknowledged the <br />space constraints at City Hall. He clarified that the motion did not specify that the space should be in City <br />Hall. He suggested that space for the councilors could be found in the Atrium Building, 858 Pearl Street, <br />th <br />or the 4 floor of the Library. Regarding the administrative support, he did not think he was serving his <br />constituents well when he spent a lot of his time filing his papers, playing “phone tag” with people trying to <br />set appointments, and gathering materials. He thought with more administrative support he could spend “a <br />heck of a lot” more time listening to his constituents, meeting with them, and advancing the policies of the <br />City. With regard to the new City Hall, he predicted it would not be completed before 2010. He suspected <br />it would serve the councilors well to have a cubicle in the meantime. <br /> <br />Councilor Papé said he would support the amendment. He said he had used the shared office and felt it <br />was underutilized. He thought it worked out well for meetings. However, he agreed that more administra- <br />tive support was needed. He said it would be nice to have the phones answered by a person. <br /> <br />Councilor Pryor apologized for not being at the Budget Committee meeting at which this issue was <br />discussed. He had financial, logistical, and philosophical concerns about the amendment. He remarked <br />that it was obvious that $70,000 was not an enormous amount of money in an overall City budget but it <br />was real money from the taxpayers. He did not plan to use the office. He said he had a desk and a phone <br />and the phone was paid for by the City. He preferred to use this money to fix a play structure in a park or <br />buy asphalt for a road that needed repair. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council June 12, 2006 Page 10 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.