My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 2A: Approval of City Council Minutes
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2006
>
CC Agenda - 07/10/06 Meeting
>
Item 2A: Approval of City Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:26:49 PM
Creation date
7/3/2006 3:10:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
7/10/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />In response to Mr. Kelly’s comments, Mr. Pangborn concurred, and noted that demand in Cottage Grove for <br />more services resulted in the addition of articulated buses along that route, which were consistently full, with <br />standing room only for buses leaving Creswell. He agreed that more revenue was needed for LTD to <br />provide more service. <br /> <br />Walnut Street Station <br /> <br />Kurt Yeiter of the Eugene Planning and Development provided an overview of the Walnut Street Mixed Use <br />Development Project, which was named for one of the two EmX stations that will serve the area. He <br />introduced Planning Commissioner John Lawless, a member of steering committee overseeing the project. <br />Mr. Yeiter called board members’ and councilors’ attention to the packet materials provided for the meeting, <br />which included a map showing the project area. He noted the many stakeholders in the process, including <br />public agencies, the business community, and residents, and emphasized the collaborative nature of the <br />project. <br /> <br />Mr. Yeiter reviewed the phases of the project, noting Phase 1, which resulted in an “emerging vision,” <br />recently ended. He anticipated that future phases would allow flexibility for new options and approaches. <br /> <br />Mr. Yeiter noted the other projects affecting the area, such as the replacement bridge over I-5, the proposed <br />basketball arena, the Agate Street Study, and LTD’s EmX project, and said that the area was ripe for <br />redevelopment. Several key properties were currently vacant. He said analysis indicated that 1,400 housing <br />units were needed in the area, adding to the opportunity to create a mixed-use center at higher densities. <br /> <br />Mr. Yeiter said that the City was considering “form-based” zoning in the area, which was a cutting-edge <br />planning concept. <br /> <br />Mr. Yeiter anticipated that traffic in the area would increase about 50 percent in the next 20 years, and it <br />would be a challenge to create a pedestrian-comfortable neighborhood that accommodated cars and future <br />needs. He suggested that cutting-edge street design and different ways of thinking about traffic could help to <br />accomplish the goal of a pedestrian-comfortable neighborhood. <br /> <br />Mr. Yeiter thanked LTD for its contributions to the project and its support of the recent speaker series that <br />brought in outside experts to discuss new trends and approaches. <br /> <br />Mr. Yeiter called attention to a list of issues to be addressed in the second phase of the project. He invited <br />questions. <br /> <br />Mr. Papé referred to a memorandum included in the Agenda Item Summary entitled “Walnut Street Station <br />Mixed Use Development Project,” which discussed the planning process and indicated the process fell short <br />of identifying the goal of a preferred alternative. He asked what the specific goal was, and what gap existed <br />in meeting it. Mr. Yeiter responded that one goal was for a more specific, defined plan. That did not occur <br />by the end of the first phase, so a range of options continued to exist, the number varying by topic. He cited <br />the issue of the street treatment as one example, where no consensus could be reached about a proposed <br />boulevard approach. Mr. Papé asked if the street treatment would guide other outstanding decisions. Mr. <br />Yeiter said yes, to some degree; the street treatment helped define the level of adjacent development and <br />pedestrian accessibility. Mr. Papé asked if the City had a process to reach other decisions about the project. <br />Mr. Yeiter said yes, during the second phase of the project, when all interests would again be brought <br />together. Staff wanted to ensure that people understood the ramifications of their preferences. He added <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council June 12, 2006 Page 3 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.