Laserfiche WebLink
<br />output. Additionally, ECO conducted a small amount of field verification <br />as a quality assurance measure.3 <br /> <br />In summary, ECO used a systematic process intended to merge several <br />databases into a single system. Chapter 2 of this report discusses issues related to <br />buildable lands databases and this project specifically. Appendix A includes a <br />discussion of the theory of buildable lands inventories. <br /> <br />ORGANIZATION OF THIS REPORT <br /> <br />The remainder of this report is organized into two chapters: <br /> <br />Chapter 2, Framework for Developing the Database discusses issues <br />related to buildable lands inventories, buildable lands databases, and how the <br />consultants and TAC approached this project. <br /> <br />Chapter 3, Preliminary Land Supply Analysis presents a series of summary <br />tables from the database. The summary tables are intended to provide context for <br />the commercial and industrial land base in the Metro UGB. It is not intended to be <br />a buildable lands inventory that complies with the Goal 9 requirements. <br /> <br />This report also includes two appendices: <br /> <br />Appendix A: Framework for Conducting Buildable Lands Inventories <br />discusses typical issues encountered in a buildable lands inventory and methods <br />for completing buildable lands inventories. <br /> <br />Appendix B: Summary of Data Sources describes data sources included in <br />the database as well as a relational diagram of the database structure. <br /> <br />3 This RFP did not request, nor did ECO conduct a systematic field assessment of the commercial and industrial land base. This is a <br />potential future step, but ECO' s assessment is that it would not result in a significant change to the overall results. <br /> <br />DRAFT: Commercial and Industrial Lands Database <br /> <br />ECONorthwest <br /> <br />July 2006 <br /> <br />Page 4 <br />