Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Exhibit C, Consistency with Wetland <br />Designation Criteria <br /> <br />Site EF <br />Amendment #42 <br /> <br />PROTECTION STANDARD <br />1. NR Metro Plan Designation <br /> <br /> <br />COMMENTS <br />Light-medium industrial. <br /> <br />PROTECTION CRITERIA MET COMMENTS <br />1. Population ofrare plant or animal species with suitable habitat No None found during wetland mapping, but site not <br /> systematically surveyed. <br />2. Primarily within 100 year floodplain Yes Three-fourths of site is within the flood hazard area. <br />3. Within 100 feet ofWEWP protected waterway No At its closest point. Amazon Creek is over 200 feet away. <br />4. Surface water connection to protected wetland No - <br />5. Habitat diversity on site or adds to diversity of habitat system No <br />6. Unique, of special importance to wetland system, and protection Yes Remaining wetland site functions as part of Stewar.t Pond <br />would further WEWP goals/objectives complex, site is owned and managed by BLM for <br /> conservation purposes. <br />7. Contains large or moderate to high value wet prairie No <br /> <br />DEVELOPMENT STANDARD MET COMMENTS <br />I. Approved Wetland Impact Permit Yes/No Southern portion of site has been filled and developed <br /> under approved state and federal fill permits. Northern <br /> portion owned by BLM. <br /> <br />DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA MET COMMENTS <br />1. Isolated, disconnected wetland No For wildlife, this site functions as part of the Stewart Pond <br /> complex, and is separated only by Stewart Road, a dead. <br /> end street with very low traffic. <br />2. Sanitary sewer, municipal water, street access Yes 8" sanitary in West 11th, 12" sanitary in Stewart Rd, 24" <br /> water in W. 11th, 16" water in Stewart Road. <br />3. Adjacent to/surrounded by development Yes Development on three sides. <br />4. Major highway or street frontage Yes South end oflot has access from W. 11th Avenue, and this <br /> portion has already been developed. <br />5. Unique, of special importance to economic development of West No <br />Eugene, and development would further WEWP goals/objectives <br />6. Site cannot be protected from adjacent uses/activities Yes/No Southern end is developed. Northern end can be protected <br /> as part of Bertelsen Slough management unit <br /> <br />RESTORATION STANDARD <br />l. Permit-required wetland mitigation site <br /> <br /> <br />COMMENTS <br /> <br />RESTORE CRITERIA MET COMMENTS <br />I. Contains hydric Soils Yes Natroy urban land complex. <br />2. Disturbed agricultural or former wetland No <br />3. Existing or potential wetland hydrology Yes <br />4. Lacks urban services No <br />5. Over 15 acres or next to protected waterway No <br /> <br />Total Wetland Acreage: 4.2, of which 2.1 acres were previously designated for <br />Development. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Recommendation: Designate tax lots 1800, 1900, 2000, 2100, 2300 and 4400 <br />(six southern tax lots) for Development. and designate <br />remainder of site for Protection. <br /> <br />City Council Decision: Same, except add Utility Corridor at NW, NE and SE <br />comers of 1704341301400. (The lot configuration on this <br />site has changed. The new lot numbers for the area to be <br />designated for Development are 1704341301800, <br />1704341301900, and the southern 96 feet oflot <br />1704341301400.) <br /> <br />Notes: <br /> <br />Tax Lots have been consolidated and completely re- <br />configured since Planning Commission review. BLM <br />now owns and manages the northern portion of this site <br />(lot 1400), which is recommended for Protection. BLM. <br />acquired this parcel in a land trade. Habitat values high in <br />the northern portion where a wet season pond provides <br />waterfowl habitat <br /> <br />Multiple Site Ordinance, Exhibit C (Refinement Plan Amendment Findings) <br /> <br />Page 73 <br />