Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Exhibit C, Consistency with Wetland <br />Designation Criteria <br /> <br />Site GD <br />Amendment #45 <br /> <br />PROTECTION STANDARD <br />1. NR Metro Plan Designation <br /> <br /> <br />COMMENTS <br />Light medium industrial. <br /> <br />PROTECTION CRITERIA MET COMMENTS <br />I. Population of rare plant or animal species with suitable habitat No None found during wetland mapping, but site not <br /> systematically surveyed. Some suitable rare plant habitat <br /> may exist within this site. - <br />2. Primarily within 100 year floodplain No None of the site is within the flood hazard area. <br />3. Within 100 feet ofWEWP protected waterway No Closest protected waterway is Amazon Creek, which is <br /> over 700 feet away. <br />4. Surface water connection to protected wetland No <br />5. Habitat diversity on site or adds to diversity of habitat system No <br />6. Unique, of special importance to wetland system, and protection No <br />would further WEWP goals/objectives <br />7. Contains large or moderate to high value wet prairie Yes Site is small and isolated, but contains some moderate <br /> value wet prairie. <br /> <br />DEVELOPMENT STANDARD <br /> <br />1. Approved Wetland Impact Permit <br /> <br /> <br />COMMENTS <br /> <br />DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA MET COMMENTS <br />1. Isolated, disconnected wetland Yes <br />2. Sanitary sewer, municipal water, street access Yes 8" sanitary in Tyinn, 8" water in Tyinn and 10th Place. <br />3. Adjacent to/surrounded by development Yes Industrial development on all four sides. <br />4. Major highway or street frontage No Abutting streets are local streets. <br />5. Unique, of special importance to economic development of West No <br />Eugene, and development would further WEWP goals/objectives <br />6. Site cannot be protected from adjacent uses/activities Yes Small size, isolation and adjacent uses make long-term <br /> protection difficult. <br /> <br />RESTORATION STANDARD <br />1. Permit-required wetland mitigation site <br /> <br /> <br />COMMENTS <br /> <br />RESTORE CRITERIA MET COMMENTS <br />1. Contains hydric Soils Yes Natroy silty clay loam <br />2. Disturbed agricultural or former wetland No Site contains wet prairie habitat. <br />3. Existing or potential wetland hydrology Yes <br />4. Lacks urban services No <br />5. Over 15 acres or n~xt to protected waterway No <br /> <br />Total Wetland Acreage: Site re-delineated at 2.0 acres. 1.1 acres filled, 0.9 acres of <br />wetland still remain. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Recommendation: Designate entire site for Development. <br /> <br />City Council Decision: Same. <br /> <br />Notes: Site is isolated, surrounded by development, has urban <br />services available, southern 1.1 acre has been filled under <br />permit FP-13504. <br /> <br />Multiple Site Ordinance, Exhibit C (Refinement Plan Amendment Findings) <br /> <br />Page 77 <br />