Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Exhibit C, Consistency with Wetland <br />Designation Criteria <br /> <br />Site HK <br />Amendment #53 <br /> <br />PROTECTION STANDARD <br />1. NR Metro Plan Designation <br /> <br /> <br />COMMENTS <br />Medium density residential. <br /> <br />PROTECTION CRITERIA MET COMMENTS <br />1. Population of rare plant or animal species with suitable habitat No None found during wetland mapping, but site not <br /> systematically surveyed. Rare plants unlikely due to <br /> grazing on site. - <br />2. Primarily within 100 year floodplain No None of site is within flood hazard area <br />3. Within 100 feet ofWEWP protected waterway No Nearest protected waterway, Amazon Creek, is more than <br /> 1700 feet away. <br />4. Surface water connection to protected wetland No <br />5. Habitat diversity on site or adds to diversity of habitat system No Disturbed pasture. <br />6. Unique, of special importance, to wetland system, and protection No <br />would further WEWP goals/objectives <br />7. Contains large or moderate to high value wet prairie No <br /> <br />DEVELOPMENT STANDARD <br />I. Approved Wetland Impact Permit <br /> <br /> <br />COMMENTS <br /> <br />DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA MET COMMENTS <br />I. Isolated, disconnected wetland Yes Nearest wetlands are over 900 feet away and are proposed <br /> for development. <br />2. Sanitary sewer, municipal water, street access No Nearest sanitary and water lines are 600-900 feet away. <br />3. Adjacent to/surrounded by development No <br />4. Major highway or street frontage Yes Tax lot containing these wetlands has frontage on West <br /> 11 th, a major arterial. <br />5. Unique, of special importance to economic development of West No <br />Eugene, and development would further WEWP goals/objectives <br />6. Site cannot be protected from adjacent uses/activities No <br /> <br />RESTORATION STANDARD <br />1. Permit-required wetland mitigation site <br /> <br /> <br />COMMENTS <br /> <br />RESTORE CRITERIA MET COMMENTS <br />1. Contains hydric Soils Yes Hydric soils not mapped, but confirmed through on site <br /> investigation to be A wbrig silty clay loam. <br />2. Disturbed agricultural or former wetland No <br />3. Existing or potential wetland hydrology Yes <br />4. Lacks urban services Yes <br />5. Over 15 acres or next to protected waterway No <br /> <br />Total Wetland Acreage: 7 <br /> <br />Planning Commission Recommendation: Designate entire site for Development. <br /> <br />City Council Decisio~: Same. <br /> <br />Notes: Site is disturbed, low quality and isolated from other <br />wetlands and waterways. <br /> <br />Multiple Site Ordinance, Exhibit C (Refinement Plan Amendment Findings) <br /> <br />Page 83 <br />