Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Exhibit C, Consistency with Wetland <br />Designation Criteria <br /> <br />Site IE <br />Amendment #59 <br /> <br />PROTECTION STANDARD <br />1. NR Metro Plan Designation <br /> <br /> <br />COMMENTS <br />Medium density residential. <br /> <br />PROTECTION CRITERIA MET COMMENTS <br />1. Population of rare plant or animal species with suitable habitat No None found during wetland mapping, but site not <br /> systematically surveyed. Rare plants unlikely due to lack <br /> of suitable habitat. - <br />2. Primarily within 100 year floodplain No None of site is within flood hazard area <br />3. Within 100 feet ofWEWP protected waterway No Nearest protected waterway, Amazon Creek, is more than <br /> 1,000 feet to the north. <br />4. Surface water connection to protected wetland No <br />5. Habitat diversity on site or adds to diversity of habitat system No Site is small pond surrounded by residential development. <br />6. Unique, of special importance to wetland system, and protection No <br />would further WEWP goals/objectives <br />7. Contains large or moderate to high value wet prairie No <br /> <br />DEVELOPMENT STANDARD <br /> <br />1. Approved Wetland Impact Permit <br /> <br /> <br />COMMENTS <br /> <br />DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA MET COMMENTS <br />1. Isolated, disconnected wetland Yes <br />2. Sanitary sewer, municipal water, street access Yes 24" sanitary and 8" water in Bertelsen Road. <br />3. Adjacent to/surrounded by development Yes Residential development on all four sides. <br />4. Major highway or street frontage Yes One of two affected lots has frontage on Bertelsen Road, <br /> a minor arterial. <br />5. Unique, of special importance to economic development of West No <br />Eugene, and development would further WEWP goals/objectives <br />6. Site cannot be protected from adjacent uses/activities Yes Site is small, surrounding by existing development and <br /> access for maintenance would be difficult. <br /> <br />RESTORATION STANDARD <br />1. Permit-required wetland mitigation site <br /> <br /> <br />COMMENTS <br /> <br />RESTORE CRITERIA MET COMMENTS <br />1. Contains hydric Soils Yes Pengra urban land complex <br />2. Disturbed agricultural or former wetland No <br />3. Existing Ot potential wetland hydrology Yes <br />4. Lacks urban services No <br />5. Over 15 acres or next to protected waterway No <br /> <br />Total Wetland Acreage: 0.9 <br /> <br />Planning Commission Recommendation: Designate entire site for Development. <br /> <br />City Council Decision: Same. <br /> <br />Notes: Site is very small and isolated from other wetlands, <br />waterways and habitat areas, and is surrounded by <br />residential development. <br /> <br />Multiple Site Ordinance. Exhibit C (Refinement Plan Amendment Findings) <br /> <br />Page 89 <br />