Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Exhibit C, Consistency with Wetland <br />Designation Criteria <br /> <br />Site A2a <br />Amendment #3 <br /> <br />PROTECTION STANDARD <br />1. NR Metro Plan Designation <br /> <br /> <br />COMMENTS <br />Agriculture/urban reserve, Special light industrial <br /> <br />PROTECTION CRITERIA MET COMMENTS <br />1. Population of rare plant or animal species with suitable habitat No This area was surveyed for rare plants in 1993 and 1994, and <br /> no rare plants were found. 1993 surveys for western pond <br /> turtles showed turtles were using..nearby wetland ponds. <br />2. Primarily within 100 year floodplain No None of site is within flood hazard area. <br />3. Within 100 feet ofWEWP protected waterway No At the closest point, these wetlands are over 400 feet from <br /> Dead Cow Creek, the nearest protected waterway. <br />4. Surface water connection to protected wetland No <br />5. Habitat diversity on site or adds to diversity of habitat system Yes Scrub/shrub habitat next to wet prairie site. <br />6. Unique, of special importance to wetland system, and protection No <br />would further WEWP goals/objectives I <br />17. Contains large or moderate to high value wet prairie No I <br /> <br />DEVELOPMENT STANDARD <br />1. Approved Wetland Impact Permit <br /> <br /> <br />COMMENTS- <br /> <br />DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA MET COMMENTS <br />1. Isolated, disconnected wetland Yes This wetland is near to, but not contiguous with, other <br /> protected wetlands. They are separated by land that has been <br /> disturbed by a previous industrial use. <br />2. Sanitary sewer, municipal water, street access No <br />3. Adjacent to/surrounded by development No <br />4. Major highway or street frontage Yes Access to these areas is from Green Hill Road, which is a <br /> minor arterial. <br />5. Unique, of special importance to economic development of West No <br />Eugene, and development would further WEWP goals/objectives <br />6. Site cannot be protected from adjacent uses/activities ? There is on-site disturbance from previous uses, but <br /> surrounding parcels are primarily protected wetlands. I <br /> <br />RESTORATION STANDARD <br />1. Permit-required wetland mitigation site <br /> <br /> <br />COMMENTS <br /> <br />RESTORE CRITERIA MET COMMENTS <br />1. Contains hydric Soils Yes Dayton silt loam <br />2. Disturbed agricultural or former wetland No <br />3. Existing or potential wetland hydrology Yes <br />4. Lacks urban services Yes <br />5. Over 15 acres or next to protected waterway No <br /> <br />Total Wetland Acreage: 1.5 <br /> <br />Planning Commission Recommendation: Re-designate from Development to Protection. <br /> <br />City Council Decision: Leave as currently designated (Development). <br /> <br />Notes: These wetlands are somewhat disturbed, and are surrounded <br />by a heavily disturbed fonner mill site. <br /> <br />Multiple Site Ordinance, Exhibit C (Refinement Plan Amendment Findings) <br /> <br />Page 41 <br />