Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Exhibit C, Consistency with Wetland <br />Designation Criteria <br /> <br />Site C6a-b <br />Amendments #24 <br /> <br />PROTECTION STANDARD <br />I. NR Metro Plan Designation <br /> <br /> <br />COMMENTS <br />Light medium industrial. <br /> <br />PROTECTION CRITERIA MET COMMENTS <br />1. Population ofrare plant or animal species with suitable habitat No None found during wetland mapping, but site not <br /> systematically surveyed. Rare plants not likely due to <br /> agricultural disturbance of si~ <br />2. Primarily within 100 year floodplain Yes Entire site is in flood hazard area <br />3. Within 100 feet ofWEWP protected waterway Yes NW corner of site is within 100 feet of A3 channel <br />4. Surface water connection to protected wetland No Street and berm provide barrier to flow. <br />5. Habitat diversity on site or adds to diversity of habitat system No Disturbed agricultural field. <br />6. Unique, of special importance to wetland system, and protection No <br />would further WEWP goals/objectives <br />7. Contains large or moderate to high value wet prairie No <br /> <br />DEVELOPMENT STANDARD <br /> <br />I. Approved Wetland Impact Permit <br /> <br /> <br />COMMENTS <br /> <br />DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA MET COMMENTS <br />I. Isolated, disconnected wetland No <br />2. Sanitary sewer, municipal water, street access Yes 36" sanitary line at north property line, water lines at east <br /> and south property lines. <br />3. Adjacent to/surrounded by development Yes Bordered by development to east, partial to south, <br /> Beltline to west. <br />4. Major highway or street frontage Yes Beltline Road; major arterial. <br />5. Unique, of special importance to economic development of West Yes Large 1-2 industrial site with small disturbed wetland <br />Eugene, and development would further WEWP goals/objectives acreage, part of site already designated for development. <br />6. Site cannot be protected from adjacent uses/activities No Wetlands are within relatively large site. <br /> <br />RESTORATION STANDARD <br />I. Permit-required wetland mitigation site <br /> <br /> <br />COMMENTS <br /> <br />RESTORE CRITERIA MET COMMENTS <br />I. Contains hydric Soils Yes Natroy silty clay loam <br />2. Disturbed agricultural or former wetland Yes <br />3. Existing ~r potential wetland hydrology Yes <br />4. Lacks urban services No <br />5. Over 15 acres or next to protected waterway No I <br /> <br />Total Wetland Acreage: 2.49, of which 1.49 is already designated for <br /> <br />Planning Commission Recommendation: Designate entire site for Development. <br /> <br />City Council Decision: Same. <br /> <br />Notes: New inventory data showed change in wetland bound;uy <br />and smaller wetland area, but no evidence to support <br />change in designation. Half of site is owned by BLM, <br />other half owned by ODOT. <br /> <br />Multiple Site Ordinance, Exhibit C (Refinement Plan Amendment Findings) Page 53 <br />