Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Exhibit C, Consistency with Wetland <br />Designation Criteria <br /> <br />Site C6g <br />Amendment # 27 <br /> <br />PROTECTION STANDARD <br />I. NR Metro Plan Designation <br /> <br /> <br />COMMENTS <br />Light medium industrial. <br /> <br />PROTECTION CRITERIA MET COMMENTS <br />1. Population of rare plant or animal species with suitable habitat No None found during wetland mapping, but site not <br /> systematically surveyed. <br />2. Primarily within 100 year floodplain Yes Entire site within flood hazard area. <br />3. Within 100 feet of WEWP protected waterway No 200 feet north of Amazon Creek. <br />4. Surface water connection to protected wetland No <br />5. Habitat diversity on site or adds to diversity of habitat system No <br />6. Unique, of special importance to wetland system, and protection No <br />would further WEWP goals/objectives <br />7. Contains large or moderate to high value wet prairie No <br /> <br />DEVELOPMENT STANDARD <br />I. Approved Wetland Impact Permit <br /> <br /> <br />COMMENTS <br /> <br />DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA MET COMMENTS <br />1. Isolated, disconnected wetland Yes <br />2. Sanitary sewer, municipal water, street access Yes <br />3. Adjacent to/surrounded by development Yes <br />4. Major highway or street frontage No <br />5. Unique, of special importance to economic development of West No <br />Eugene, and development would further WEWP goals/objectives <br />6. Site cannot be protected from adjacent uses/activities ? Surrounding industrial uses, disturbance, small size. <br /> <br />RESTORATION STANDARD <br />I. Permit-required wetland mitigation site <br /> <br /> <br />COMMENTS <br /> <br />RESTORE CRITERIA MET COMMENTS <br />I. Contains hydric Soils Yes Natroy silty clay loam <br />2. Disturbed agricultural or former wetland No <br />3. Existing or potential wetland hydrology Yes <br />4. Lacks urban services No <br />5. Over 15 acres or next to protected waterway No <br /> <br />Total Wetland Acreage: 0.61 acres (0.77 acres filled since PC recommendation). <br /> <br />Planning Commission Recommendation: Designate entire site for Development. <br /> <br />City Council Decision: Same. <br /> <br />Notes: Portion of site previously designated for Development. <br />New delineation showed site to be larger, but more than <br />half the site has been filled. Site is still small, isolated, <br />disturbed and with services available. <br /> <br />Multiple Site Ordinance, Exhibit C (Refinement Plan Amendment Findings) <br /> <br />Page 56 <br />