My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ordinance No. 20201
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Ordinances
>
2000 No. 20184-20219
>
Ordinance No. 20201
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 4:42:53 PM
Creation date
7/7/2006 3:54:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Recorder
CMO_Document_Type
Ordinances
Document_Date
8/7/2000
Document_Number
20201
Author
James D. Torrey
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Restore Description Whole North SE SW <br />Criterion # Site Area Field Field <br />1 Permit required mitigation site Part No Part No <br /> <br />Restore Description Whole North SE SW <br />Criterion # Site Area Field Field <br />1 Hydric soils Yes Yes Yes Yes <br />2 Disturbed Ag or previous wetland Part Yes Yes No <br />3 Wetland hydrology Yes Yes Yes Yes <br />4 Lacks infrastructure No No No No <br />5 Larger than 15 acres or contiguous with Yes Yes Yes Yes <br /> protected waterway <br />Total Restoration Criteria Met (out of 5) 4 4 4 3 <br /> <br />No part of the site meets the Protection or Development Standards, and a portion of the site meets <br />the Restoration Standard. Therefore, it is appropriate to apply the Protection and Development <br />Criteria to the portion of the site that does not meet the Restoration Standard. The site as a whole <br />meets five of seven Protection Criteria, four of six Development Criteria, and four of five <br />Restoration criteria. With high values for both Protection and Development, it is appropriate to <br />also consider the Restoration Criteria. Given the high Protection and Development values, the <br />criteria indicate that some of the site should be designated for Development and some of the site <br />should be designated for Protection. With varying levels of wetland quality and varying habitat <br />types, it is also appropriate to consider the Restoration designation for some of the wetlands on <br />the site. <br /> <br />The wetlands in the "north area" do not meet any of the three standards, which means it is <br />appropriate to evaluate these wetlands against the criteria for Protection and Development. These <br />wetlands meet two of seven Protection criteria, and four of six Development criteria. With <br />relatively high development values, and relatively low protection values, this area is most <br />appropriate for the Development designation, and the Restoration criteria do not need to be <br />applied to this area. Therefore, the Development designation for the "North Area" wetlands is <br />consistent with the adopted wetland designation criteria. <br /> <br />The wetlands in the southwest field do not meet any of the standards, which means it is <br />appropriate to evaluate this area against the criteria for Protection and Development. The <br />southwest field meets five out of the seven Protection criteria and two of the six Development <br />criteria. With relatively high protection values, and relatively low development values, the <br />Restoration criteria do not need to be applied to this area. The southwest field is less disturbed <br />than the southeast field, and meets fewer of the Restoration criteria. It has relatively high <br /> <br />Hyundai Site Ordinance, Exhibit C (Refinement Plan Amendment Findings) <br /> <br />Page 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.