Laserfiche WebLink
<br />species, nor what number of plants makes a viable population or whether the plants produce seed. <br />Two individual state-listed endangered plants listed have been found on the site, and both are <br />within areas proposed for Restoration. The Metro Plan policy clearly calls for protection of state- <br />listed plant species. The notice and opportunity for public participation have been provided by <br />the West Eugene Wetlands Plan amendments adoption process. We conclude that the proposed <br />designation for the site, including the Restoration designation for the southeast field, which <br />contains all of the known rare plant species, would provide adequate protection for state-listed <br />rare plants and is therefore consistent with the above policy. <br /> <br />Policy 29, page III-C-l1: "Local governments shall work with owners of designated <br />environmentally-sensitive areas to require that reasonable actions are taken to protect <br />these lands, e.g., the heronry at the confluence of the Willamette and McKenzie Rivers <br />and the site of the Aster curtus in the Willow Creek Basin." <br /> <br />This policy guides city action for sites that have already been designated environmentally <br />sensitive, rather than providing guidance for which areas to designate so. We conclude, therefore, <br />that the above policy does not bear upon this decision. <br /> <br />Policy 2, page III-E-3: "Natural vegetation, natural water features, and drainageways shall <br />be protected and retained to the maximum extent practicable, considering the economic, <br />social, environmental and energy consequences in the design and construction of urban <br />development and landscaping shall be utilized to enhance those natural features." <br /> <br />This policy calls for a balancing of economic and social considerations with environmental ones, <br />with the emphasis on protecting natural vegetation, natural water features and drainageways in <br />evaluating design, construction and landscaping for proposed development. The decision here <br />is not one of evaluating a site design, but determining the broad suitability of a wetland area for <br />Development, Restoration or Protection. So, although the site contains both natural vegetation <br />and a natural water feature (wetland), we conclude that this policy is not intended to apply to this <br />situation. <br /> <br />The economic and social impacts of protecting this area are uncertain. Presently, projections <br />about both benefits and liabilities stemming from future development of this site are <br />unsubstantiated projections, and are not considered as evidence upon which to base the wetland <br />designation decision. With limited information available about how the site might be developed, <br />it is unclear how to evaluate the potential benefits and liabilities of future development on this <br />site. <br /> <br />Section 9.145(2)(b) "The plan amendment is consistent with remaining portions of the <br />refinement plan"; <br /> <br />The findings below address consistency of these amendments with Goals and Policies in the West <br />Eugene Wetlands Plan. <br /> <br />Hyundai Site Ordinance, Exhibit C (Refinement Plan Amendment Findings) <br /> <br />Page 21 <br />