Laserfiche WebLink
Chad & KatieWilson. <br />This letter is based on theEugene City Council Agenda Item Summary (AIS) for the November 14, 2016 <br />meeting and the attachedmaterials.References to Wxxreferto the pages identifiedas“WILSON <br />EXHIBITS–Pagexx”. <br />1.As of today, there arenodocumentsrelated to this applicationposted on the City’s on-line Land <br />Use Application website. <br />Would you please promptly post all relevant application material on the City’s website, <br />and advise me when they are available. <br />2.The October 3, 2016 Letter from Bill Kloos provided information in response toa request from the <br />City for more information. This wouldappear tomean that the application wasn’t“complete” until <br />at least that date. Based on that date, the statutory deadline for a decision by the City would be <br />April 1, 2017. <br />Wouldyou please provide the datethe claim application was deemed“complete”and the <br />corresponding deadline for a decision by the Citypursuantto ORS 300.195(10) and(6). <br />3.ORS195.305(5)provides that:“\[a\]public entity may adopt or apply procedures for the processing <br />ofMeasure 49\]claims.”I haven’t been able to locate any City Council resolution or Administrative <br />Order that was adoptedsettingforth procedures for processingMeasure 49 claims. <br />Would you please identify the procedures that staffarefollowing for processing this <br />Measure 49claim; particularly, any procedure adopted by the City setting forth the <br />timelines for a publichearing, including extending the hearing beyond the date when oral <br />testimony is accepted so that additional evidence and arguments may be submitted <br />according to ORS 195.314(3). <br />1 <br />4.There are numerous potential deficiencies in the appraisals submitted by the applicantthat must <br />beindependently evaluated by the City to determine compliance with requirements of“fair market <br /> <br />