Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Street are located outside the city limits. As required by state law, the Lane County <br />Commissioners will be asked to approve the inclusion of these properties in the local <br />improvement district. One of these properties, owned by the Lydums, has additional <br />characteristics that required special consideration. The property has a greater than <br />normal frontage along Terry Street, and is larger than a normal lot. For these reasons, <br />after discussions with the Lydums, the City Engineer proposed that the assessment of the <br />property be limited at the time of the improvement to the first 95 feet of the property, <br />with the rest of the assessment postponed until the property is divided and the remainder <br />is developed. <br /> <br />City Engineer Les Lyle explained that the Lydum property also uses a septic <br />system that is located ion the right-of-way of Terry Street and will need to be removed. <br />To deal with this problem, the Engineer explained that the city is proposing to establish a <br />connection between the Lydum's property and the city sewer system. The assessments <br />for this installation would be delayed until the property was annexed. These statements <br />prompted the attorney for the Lydums to ask city engineer Lyle several questions about <br />the nature of the City's proposed connection. These questions concerned the nature of <br />the sewer connection being offered and the proposed method of payment. The city <br />Engineer answered the questions asked, and the Hearings Official asked that the Lydums' <br />attorney postpone further questions until the City Engineer's summary of the project was <br />completed. <br /> <br />The City Engineer continued discussing the other noteworthy aspects of the <br />project by turning to the existing subdivision at the other end of the proposed project. At <br />the time the Flatbush subdivision was developed at the south end of this portion of Terry <br />Street, the developer installed a half street where the proposed Terry Street improvements <br />will be made. Because the City can use that half street, the City proposes that the persons <br />abutting this portion of the street not be assessed for street improvements, and be <br />assessed for sidewalk improvements only if they do not respond to the City's offer to <br />allow the property owners to construct their own sidewalks before the City reaches that <br />part of the project in June 1999. <br /> <br />The City Engineer concluded his presentation by describing the proposed <br />allocation of costs between the City and the local improvement district. The non- <br />assessable share of the project, the portion to be paid by the City, is nearly $800,000 out <br />of the total estimated cost of approximately $1.1 million dollars. <br /> <br />The first member of the public to address the hearing was Fred Thompson, a <br />property owner within the proposed local improvement district. Mr. Thompson indicated <br />that he opposed the proposed curves and other devices proposed to slow traffic along <br />Terry Street. Mr. Thompson objected to the idea of slowing traffic because he felt that it <br />would increase noise and increase pollution. Mr. Thompson felt that Terry Street was <br />intended to be a thoroughfare, and on such streets traffic should be allowed travel <br />quickly. <br />