My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution No. 4575
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Resolutions
>
1998 No. 4551-4582
>
Resolution No. 4575
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 4:47:27 PM
Creation date
7/12/2006 2:17:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Recorder
CMO_Document_Type
Resolutions
Document_Date
10/12/1998
Document_Number
4575
CMO_Effective_Date
12/12/1998
Author
Warren G. Wong
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />possibility of an appeal to tax court. Mr. Lyle and the hearings official explained that this <br />provision was included as a response to Ballot Measure 5. It involved questions about <br />the nature of the assessment and how it related to property taxes, and did not concern the <br />separate right of remonstrance. Mr. Alvis questioned the use of the term "specially <br />benefited" in the latter. He felt that none of the properties in the local improvement <br />district were specially benefited, even though they were adjacent to Terry Street. City <br />Engineer Les Lyle responded that the term specially benefited was a term commonly <br />used in assessment law. The Eugene Code uses the term, but it also includes a more <br />specific requirement that properties that abut a street that is being approved should be <br />assessed. <br /> <br />After this general discussion, the hearing concluded at 7: 10 p.m. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.