My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/23/17 City Council Agenda Packet
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Public Meetings
>
CMO
>
2017
>
01-23-2017
>
01/23/17 City Council Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/20/2017 1:15:16 PM
Creation date
1/20/2017 1:14:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Packet
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/23/2017
CMO_Effective_Date
1/23/2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
154
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ATTACHMENT B <br /> <br />Policy 10. Annexation to a city through normal processes shall continue to be the <br />highest priority (page II-C-5). <br /> <br />Policy 15. Ultimately, land within the UGB shall be annexed to a city and provided with <br />the required minimum level of urban facilities and services. While the time <br />frame for annexation may vary, annexation should occur as land transitions <br />from urbanizable to urban. (page II-C-5) <br /> <br />As addressed below under subsection (3), and consistent with these policies, a minimum <br />level of key urban facilities and services can be provided to the area in an orderly and <br />efficient manner. This annexation request is proposed by the property owner and is <br />subject to the City’s normal process for consideration of voluntary annexations. <br /> <br />The Metro Plandesignates the subject property for low density residentialuse, and as <br />such, future rezoning will be required to bring the property’s zoning into conformance <br />with the designation for low density residential use (from AG Agricultural to R-1 Low- <br />Density Residential). The Laurel Hill Plan and the South Hills Study are the adopted <br />refinement plans for the subject property, however neither plan includes policies that <br />would serve as approval criteria for the proposed annexation. <br />EC 9.7825(3) The proposed annexation will result in a boundary in which the minimum level of key <br />urban facilities and services, as defined in the Metro Plan, can be provided in an <br />orderly, efficient, and timely manner. <br />Complies <br />Findings: The proposed annexation will result in a boundary in which the minimum <br /> NO <br />level of key urban facilities and services can be provided in an orderly, efficient, and <br />YES <br />timely manner as detailed below: <br /> <br />Wastewater <br />There is an 8-inch line within Central Boulevard available to serve the subject property; <br />the distance from the subject property to the public wastewater line is approximately <br />450 feet. The public system can beextended by the property owner/developer to serve <br />the subject property. <br /> <br />Stormwater <br />Stormwater drainage facilities are not immediately available to the subject property but <br />can be provided at the time of development consistent with the City’s stormwater <br />regulations. <br /> <br />Transportation <br />This property has frontage on existing un-improved right-of-way, identified as City <br />owned Tax Lot 301, Assessor’s map 18-03-09-20; this right-of-way is expected to be the <br />future extension of Spring Boulevard. Consistency with public improvementand street <br />standards will be evaluated and ensured at the time of development. A Lane County <br />Facility Permit may also be required for any future connection to Spring Boulevard, <br />Furtick, Don (A 16-10) January 2017 Page 2 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.