My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution No. 4740 Amendments
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Resolutions
>
2002 No. 4697-4745
>
Resolution No. 4740 Amendments
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 4:48:28 PM
Creation date
7/13/2006 1:35:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Recorder
CMO_Document_Type
Resolutions
Document_Number
4740 Amends
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />2. Performance Improvements -Projects that increase system capaCity by inCreasing the" <br />level of performance provided by facilities. Unlike I capacity' projects that relate only to <br />the next. increment of capacity, performance upgrades are generally sized based on total <br />projected capacity needs at the end of the planning period (existing and future). <br /> <br />3. " Rehabilitation - Projects designed to remedy an existing system deficiency and do "not <br />enhance system capacity. <br /> <br />Capacity arid" performance upgrade projects can be new facilities, or upgrade/ expansion of <br />existmg facilities. Rehabilitation projects are the replacement of outdated. or worn out <br />" "equipment or facilities. <br /> <br />The inajorityof the projects will typically fall completely into one project type. However, <br />some projects may be split between capacity and performance types. The general criteria for <br />allocating projects to the above categorie.s are shown in Table 5. These criteria should be <br />applied in the" d~velopment of specific projects for inclusion in the appropriate planning <br />do<:ument or project list and should be considered and evaluated as part of the process of <br />adoption of such a plan or project list. <br /> <br />TABLE 5 <br />Summary of Project Type Allocation Criteria <br /> <br />Project Type <br />Capacity <br /> <br />Potential Criteria <br /> <br />A<;tds new facllitiesfexpands existing facilities <br /> <br />Provides new liquids treatment or biosolids capacity beyond existing <br />system d~sign standard or beyond the current permitted capaCity <br /> <br />Adds new facilitieslimproves existing facilities <br /> <br />Provides capacityfenhanced capability sized for total future capacity <br />needs <br /> <br />Driven by new regulatory requirement <br /> <br />Driven by increase in community performance standard <br /> <br />Technological efficiencies <br /> <br />Replaces existing facility or portion of facility <br /> <br />Does not serve growth either through existing available or new " <br />capacity <br /> <br />Preserves existing facility performance/capacity <br /> <br />Performance Improvements <br /> <br />Rehabilitation <br /> <br />Once project costs have been allocated to system component and project type categories, <br />and the costs have been distributed to the system capacity parameters, the final step in the <br />project cost allocation process is to assign costs to user types. For the purposes of the SDC <br />methodology, there are two user types: 1) existing customers, and 2). new customers or <br />growth. Costs that are allocated to growth are incorporated into the SDC improvement fee <br />calculation. Costs allocated to existing customers must be paid through some- other fuilding <br />sources (e.g., existing reserVes or future user rates). <br /> <br />As irtdicated in Figure 3, the allocation of project costs to growth is a function of the type of <br />project and a detailed capacity analysis that identifies growth's share of: 1) planned capacity <br />expansion, and 2) total future load. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.